233
submitted 1 year ago by tmpod@lemmy.pt to c/technology@beehaw.org
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] enitoni@beehaw.org 25 points 1 year ago

Say what you want about the EU, but at least they keep greedy companies in check as much as they can.

[-] tmpod@lemmy.pt 15 points 1 year ago

They could certainly do better, but they do quite a bit yeah.

[-] enitoni@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

For sure, but it's better than nothing. Imagine the world without the EU... shudders

[-] tmpod@lemmy.pt 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, agreed

[-] zomtecos@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well… for iPhones (and other smartphones) I’m not sure if anything changes. There is a exception in the regulation: if the device is waterproof, it is enough if the manufacturer or repair shops can change the battery for you. They do not need to be user replaceable.

But probably for MacBooks, there will be replaceable batteries in the future. I don’t see, how Apple will find a way around this regulation.

Apple Watch: they are waterproof —> nothing changes.

AirPods: well… are they waterproof? I don’t see user changeable batteries ever. Perhaps they will become waterproof in the future too? :) AirPods, now also for swimming and diving!

iPads: well: probably there will be changeable batteries in the future. Or we will have underwater Tablets soon. We just need another input method. Probably gestures like the VisionPro?

[-] worfamerryman@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

How is “water proof” defined in the legislation? Apple carefully says their devices are water resistant. There is a possibility that it will not qualify.

[-] neutronst4r@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The industry standard is the IP rating: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_code The first digit is dust protection grade.
The second digit is water protection grade.
IP67 is a common consumer electronics requirement.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ben@feddit.dk 15 points 1 year ago

Being able to have a spare battery in case of emergency (or simply app train/bus tickets) is going to be nice. It's going go be exciting to see how apple will try to circumvent this.

[-] RuteNL@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

i believe the law is more about easily being able to replace a battery for repair than being able to swap it on the go

[-] ben@feddit.dk 2 points 1 year ago

that would make sense. Being able to "easily remove and replace them." is a little vague, i wonder if requiring a screwdriver could be considered easily removable.

[-] broadbean@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

We can relive having your phone explode into three separate pieces when you drop it! Seriously though, this is good news in my opinion.

[-] pohart@lemmyrs.org 2 points 1 year ago
[-] madkarlsson@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Not OP but yes, it is quite exciting tbh

[-] pohart@lemmyrs.org 2 points 1 year ago

I think I was unclear. I agree that having replaceable batteries is exciting. Ben sarcastically called Apple coming up with a way to circumvent the law exciting. And I agreed, also sarcastically.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] narc0tic_bird@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I doubt they'll circumvent this. They don't seem to circumvent the mandated USB-C port if the rumors are to be trusted.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] raspberrybush@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago

I love what the EU does to technology. Thank you EU!

[-] kestrel7@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

For real, as an American I'm super grateful.

[-] chamim@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

I think we reached a point where flagship phones are good enough to be used for more than 5 years. But the battery won't live that long, for. most people. I've replaced my previous phone, after four years of using it, for the most part because of the battery. I'm looking forward to replaceable batteries returning and helping at least some of us keep our phones for a few more years.

[-] tmpod@lemmy.pt 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, for sure. My last phone lasted two months shy of 6 years, and was replaced because of a touch issue (a little strip across the screen no longer acted on touch, which made typing and other stuff completely impossible), and was only "fine" in regards to battery because it was a huge one to begin with (+4Ah for a 5" screen). The battery was definitely way worse than original, but still on par with some new phones today lol

[-] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 14 points 1 year ago

Now it seems Apple will need to figure out how to allow access to the battery inside future iPhones, as will every other smartphone manufacturer.

There's nothing to figure out. All manufacturers have already used removable batteries in the past. Just blow the dust off the old designs and adapt them!

[-] 2d@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

There will be a lot to figure out. The new designs provide features that the old ones couldn't- and there are very few people who would prioritize a replaceable battery over other features.

[-] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

I don't know if you ever see the ifixit tear downs, there is no new tricks. The battery is still replaceable, it's just that the manufacturing process adds more stuff to "anti-tempering". Let me list a few:

  • special kind of screw, some screw can't be unscrewed without special screw driver
  • we all know about glue battery so they are fixed in place AND harder to remove safely.
  • they add more of those tiny ribbon around so if you don't know the internal layout there is a chance you break the ribbon.
  • plastic wedge that might be broken when you try to pry it open(so when you put the cover back it's a bit loose, and lose water resist), even with proper tool. They designed it so it was not suppose to open again. ( I have a old casio slim camera that can still be water resistant with removable battery, there is no reason why a phone can't do the same with modern materials. )
[-] kestrel7@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

there are very few people who would prioritize a replaceable battery over other features.

I gotta gently push back against this. You may not know them personally, but there are a LOT of people who have gone back to dumbphones over this. IMO, this is a large part of why dumbphone sales are catching up on smartphone sales for the first time in years. I even know some elderly folks who stopped using cell phones entirely when smartphones stopped having replaceable batteries (easier going back to having a landline when one is retired/not raising kids, of course).

There are very few people who buy the currently existing smartphones who would prioritize this feature, yes -- because anyone who does prioritize this feature has been excluded from the entire smartphone market for several years now.

[-] techno156@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It'd also go well with modern battery packs, because you can just have a spare battery sitting and charging away in your bag, and can swap it on the fly, without having to have a cable dangling about that might get caught on things, or bent the wrong way.

The only downside with a replaceable battery is that you have to switch the phone off to do it, but that's small potatoes for effectively charging the phone to full in an instant.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] tmpod@lemmy.pt 2 points 1 year ago

They sure will fight it. The main counter-argument I see is water proofing, but I believe I've seen a phone with good proofing but still accessible. Don't remember the brand and model though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rglullis@communick.news 9 points 1 year ago

My Fairphone 3 already has replaceable batteries. What is really missing is an industry-standard form factor, like ATX/ITX exists for desktops.

If there were a standard, we'd be able to upgrade the components as needed. We wouldn't be forced to waste perfectly good displays just because we would like to upgrade the CPU. Companies wouldn't be pushing for new upgrades every year. Apple/Samsung wouldn't be able to hold their dominance because it would be easier for smaller players to specialize in specific components. The entire maker community wouldn't have to be fighting over Raspberry PI and we could even have a cottage industry around upcycled consumer electronics.

[-] luciole@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

It’s the first time I hear about Fairphone. How they embrace repairability is amazing. I hope they’ll expand to North America at one point.

[-] tmpod@lemmy.pt 3 points 1 year ago

That would be quite utopian, however I feel such a thing would be incredible hard to achieve. Different form factors require different layouts, space is much tighter and should not be wasted. In desktop PC land, you have plenty of room to fit things as you want.
It may not be showstopper, but it's certainly a challenge. And of course, companies won't like it :P

[-] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 1 year ago

I feel like the opposite: the constraints are so well-known and so well defined that most phones end up looking the same anyway, we might as well just take one of them (any of them!) and make it a standard.

companies won’t like it

Apple/Samsung surely won't. But I'd bet that the smaller ones would like to have some type of level-playing field. Also, imagine the amount of startups that could come up in the space.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] userdata0@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

So there's going to be a catch here and I'm curious how it will work out. Integrating the battery directly into the phone without it being easily removable is going to mean less capacity since the battery will need a heavier-duty shell since you can't rely on the phone itself for protection. I get the e-waste angle but generally I wouldn't keep a phone past the end of updates anyways, and usually battery life is still acceptable at 4 years with good practices (not charging to 100% and holding it there overnight, etc).

[-] DekkerNSFW@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

My last two phones both got slow as their batteries got bad, and were basically like new after replacing them. My current phone doesn't allow swapping the batteries.

For someone thrifty, being able to replace the battery can extend a phone's life 2x or more. Even if you don't want to keep using it, you could still resell it or give it to someone who doesn't need the newest phones. Non-swappable batteries are a form of planned obsolescence, in addition to just being more compact and probably a little cheaper.

[-] lemillionsocks@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

I imagine they can still use screws and the connectors like they do. The screws just need to be some place you can get to without having to use a heat gun to remove your entire damn screen.

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

I've had my current phone for around 5 years. I'm on the latest LineageOS. I have no speed issues. The battery is starting to show signs of age. My previous phone had a longer life and got through two batteries. It was up to date with LineageOS until it's last days. It was lack of RAM that did it in. My current phone still has mid level amount of RAM.

EU needs to look at updatablity next. If the vendors no longer provides real updates, they should unlock the bootloader. Really I want phones to like PCs and not require a custom OS each....

[-] keardap@lemmy.selfhost.quest 6 points 1 year ago

Had to replace my previous phone due to bad battery.

Kept it safe, used cover and screen protection, but the battery got so bad it was not mobile anymore.

Now? Now all the complexity that went into making the phone is e-waste, what a shame.

[-] tmpod@lemmy.pt 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly! It bums me so much that the vast majority of the money you spent buying the device and of the money spent making the device is completely thrown out because you can't replace a little component that was perfectly replaceable 10 years ago.... 🙄

[-] homoludens@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

And not only money - resources and energy as well.

[-] tmpod@lemmy.pt 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, exactly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

That’s a generous timeline, but I’m sure manufacturers are whining about it anyway.

[-] tmpod@lemmy.pt 4 points 1 year ago

Naturally. Just a shame it isn't a bit earlier :P

[-] coffee@geddit.social 4 points 1 year ago

Will the phones still be waterproof?

[-] narc0tic_bird@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

Louis Rossmann did a video on this and pointed out that there were phones that had IP67 (Samsung Galaxy S5) or even IP68 (some Sony phone) rating with user replaceable batteries. So yeah, they should be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] techno156@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

I don't see why they wouldn't be.

It wasn't all that long ago that we had waterproof phones, with similar ratings as current phones, whilst also having a replaceable battery.

The Samsung Galaxy S5 had an IP67 rating, for example, despite having a headphone jack, and a replaceable battery/removable back. (it also featured wireless charging, which was surprisingly forward for the time).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] binboupan@lemmy.kagura.eu 4 points 1 year ago

I've always wondered if there is a physical limitation why the battery couldn't go in like a sim card? Just a slot where it goes in. I'm curious how this all will work out.

[-] ByteSorcerer@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

That's pretty much how it used to work.

The main reasons why it changed are:

  • Space, as a connector is slightly bigger than a soldered connection, and the battery itself has to be slightly bigger and stronger too to be safe to transport and handle without being protected by the phone's case.

  • Water resistance; it's far easier to make a phone's case waterproof by just glueing the whole thing shut than having to use seals and gaskets and such to make it possible to open and close it at will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

The other thing that seems to fail is USB-C connector. I wonder if the USB-C connectors in most phones last beyond 5 years. Mine still works but I cannot plug the device in and use it without it just falling out pretty quickly. The old micro USB plugs seem a little more robust.

[-] Lowbird@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

This is dramatically the opposite of my experience. I've never had a usb-c port die, but the microUSB ports were fragile as heck.

I've had cheapo USB-C cables die but that's because cheap.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
233 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37724 readers
493 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS