773

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there's still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ambiorickx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The unemployed should have to pay income tax on the income they would earn if they were employed

[-] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Feel free to react here or on !economics@lemmy.ml

[-] glasschewer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wow they don't????? Cool!!!!! i love incentivizing the use of housing as an asset to store money!!!! Fuck!!!!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
773 points (100.0% liked)

Personal Finance

3819 readers
1 users here now

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS