54
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

AI has been a smashing success at separating venture capitalists from their money. And just like "blockchain" before it, the hype cycle will fall off eventually and VC money will move on to "the next big thing". And hopefully, we can stop having "AI" jammed into everything. Gods know I'll be happy when I can hear about a security tool and the first thing out of the salesman's mouth isn't some drivel about their product being "AI enabled". Which invariably means "it provides a fuckton of false positives, with zero context, explanation or idea what the fuck the model kicked on".

[-] juli@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

AI has been so successful that many company have to package it as something that the customers have no choice but to accept it along with the price rise.

But in the books, CEOs get to claim "AI raised the revenue".

[-] zoostation@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Right, the elephant in the room was always that replacing vast human labor was the holy grail that justified the crazy investment.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 3 points 6 days ago

One little appreciated aspect of the Trump presidency, is that it may include millions of job losses to AI & robotics. I wonder will this be the No 1 issue in the 2028 election ? (if there is one).

[-] knightly@pawb.social 10 points 6 days ago

Nah, the #1 issue of 2028 will be managing the fallout of the "AI" bubble popping and taking the wildly overinvested American tech sector with it.

[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Tho if I lose my job in 2025 cause Trump tanked the economy with tarrifs or whatnot, I'll def consider applying at Stargate cause 500 bil is enough for them to just be hiring like crazy. It'd at least hold me over till I found another long term gig

[-] rimu@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

The only people applying at Stargate will be Nvidia GPUs

[-] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 1 points 6 days ago

If anything this will bolster him running for term 3 with the propaganda machine that is social media into overdrive because with all those job cuts come (short term) profits!!!!!!

[-] jrs100000@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

They dont need to automate all office jobs to turn a profit. Theres about 18 million office workers in the US and they make an average of around 50k per year. Thats about 900 billion per year, and thats just the US without taxes, office space, utilities and other overhead. If AI could increase average office worker productivity by 50% and OpenAI could capture most of that they could pay back their investment within just a few years and become the most profitable company the world has ever seen. The problem, however, is not just technical, its is going to be capturing that economic windfall, and keeping the savings from being passed on to clients and consumers. Political backing from a reckless and authoritarian autocrat might go a long way towards securing that goal.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I mean, that cart is miles ahead of the horse.

[-] jrs100000@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

AI agents that can replace humans are miles away, but AI that can improve human output isnt.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Mmmmmmmm . . . Sort of kind of, to some extent.

The trade-offs and fine-print and all the hidden steps and caveats to everything - it’s like at least 10 years too early, but the unfathomable hype frenzy means we’re going to get stick with something. A generalizing summary bot is - OK.

If they can ever get it to not have to be double-checked every time it’d be more useful. But the fact is, AI simply doesn’t understand what words mean. Math is good, code is a sort-of in-between. Everything else is a crapshoot.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Looks like bailouts are back on the menu.

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

1943 readers
108 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS