335
submitted 2 weeks ago by Cool_Name@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 272 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

sometimes you bring on a ceo just to get some controversial thing done. they can eat the blame and then leave

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 89 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm embarrassed it took me so long to realize this. Somebody explained that to me recently, within the context of a conversation about layoffs. That CEO had no prior CEO experience, was only there for less than a year, and was part of the board of directors. In hindsight it seems so obvious.

[-] rational_lib@lemmy.world 62 points 2 weeks ago
[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago
[-] PanArab@lemm.ee 59 points 2 weeks ago

Tacit racism. She is a US citizen of Chinese background. Why have her face on the flag of the Empire of Japan if the subliminal message wasn’t yellow peril?

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago

Good point, although I agree with the sentiment of online communities becoming hugboxes with no room for actual dissent.

[-] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

But that was the idea

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

And it should be noted, it was shit like "you can't have a subreddit entirely devoted to encouraging groups you dislike to kill themselves"

[-] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago

So like a corporate sin eater?

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

You bring in a female CEO to take the fall. The narrative gets to be about her weak leadership.

Ellen Pao wasn’t even CEO for a full year. Reddit clearly put her in charge to take the heat - which they knew would be ample based on her sex alone.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

So replacing a woman with a woman, and then bringing back the original woman is what made you think the fall person had to be a woman? Reddit may have done so.. but I find it hard to believe this was sex/gender related. Otherwise it would have made more sense to replace the woman with a man, have him take the fall and go back to Whitney so it made her / the company look better long term.

[-] Kuma@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly this, they are usually young too and they know their only job is to fire ppl and/or do decisions that will make most if not all unhappy. I have only seen it once my self but a lot of friends went through that at their company.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

the sad part is the act they put on coming in. many at the company will think this is a real hire that will bring about good cultural change

[-] Bojack411@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

It's what boeing does everytime a plane goes down.

[-] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

That must be quite a list of ceo's

[-] sem 120 points 2 weeks ago

Is the signature feature that women initiate or was that some other app?

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 56 points 2 weeks ago
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 15 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. I used the BFF version for a bit to try and find folks in my area to hang out with. It's a really horrible app. When someone messages you, you have 24 hours to respond. If you don't then the two of you get unmatched. I can understand something like unlatching after some time period without responding, but just 24 hours? Ick.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

We have shareholders to consider! Now get on with your relationship before we unnecessarily cut you off.

Brought to you by Match, "You're next Bumble, you think they fucked up Bumble already!? Just you wait!'

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago

This just gave me the (shit post) idea of an app where VC funders can swipe on projects they want to invest in or not

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

That would make a great parody sketch.

[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Probably, considering that it was enough to get the company to the point that it could go public. And for the company to lose 54% of its "value" after changing it.

So it got enough eyes on the platform to serve them ads or subscriptions or whatever their monetization strategy was...did the product ever once function as advertised?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 2 weeks ago

Not really because a lot of women just used to begin the conversation with "hi" which gave you nothing to work with. Especially when they had a basically empty bio.

So basically suffered from exactly the same problem that every other dating app suffered from which is that nobody really puts the effort in.

Never really got the problem with opening with "hey."

In person, she'll look like a defecating sphincter if she completely ignores you, so you'll at least get a "hey" back, and you can play it from the energy she responds with, go earnest, go smooth, go funny, go away, etc. What do you want me to do, compose a fucking sonnet out of the profile you didn't even fill out? "Soft, she who likes dogs and is very laid back, I know which one of the four girls in her profile photo I hope she is?"

[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Whether or not it did enough people thought it did for it to get really popular, and then when those features went away get significantly less popular. I never used it but judging from how its popularity rose and fell: probably.

[-] Tiuku@sopuli.xyz 44 points 2 weeks ago

Ohh you mean the "pay for every little thing" -feature? Dang I really liked that

[-] golli@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

Also regarding cost: I have yet to hear how a dating app solves the paradox that success means losing a customer. The incentives of the company and customer are not aligned and actually quite the opposite.

The company wants you to stay and spend as much as possible on the platform (optimizing to keep you just engaged enough to stick with it), whereas the ideal outcome for the customer means not needing the app in as little time as possible.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oh they solved it alright. They just make it harder to find matches. Could you imagine the fuckery that goes on with their algorithms. Some engineer dialing back the chance of falling in true love. The executive is like, "We need to turn down finding true love to .0007% because we are losing too many customers!"

[-] golli@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

I meant success in the context of what a dating app should achieve: Matching suitable partners.

But you are of course right that for the company success is profit and the rest are just variables to be optimized towards that goal.

[-] Tiuku@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah that conflict runs deep.

There's the open source Alovoa, but of course it's still far away from mainstream.

[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 9 points 1 week ago

Wow, as a gay dude reading the comments here, straight dating sucks, why is it even like that?

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Bumble used to be different back in the day. I tried it when it was going down the tubes.

I think part of the problem is that the matching is fairly superficial, so while you know a little about the person, most of the details amount to their face, 1-3 hobbies, and their ass.

The women I matched with that I went out with were awkward and felt forced. In the end, I ended up falling in love with a close guy friend that I had known for years.

If bumble wants success, they should allow for much deeper Q&A, longer response times, a tweaked algorithm that matches people based off hobbies and passions, and an AD section that allows people to privately put in stuff that they like after dark. Info that isn't shared with their matches, but helps make people match better with people like them.

As for straight dating though, idk. I feel like people should probably be avoiding apps and meeting organically through stuff like biking groups, climbing groups, skiing events, big dance venues, etc. it fosters much more organic connections.

I don't participate in bar culture that much, but the difference between the gay bars I've gone to and the straighter college-y bars feels immense. The former is much more social with a pinch of kink, the latter is where people are getting absolutely blitzed without much dialogue over loud music. It's an extremely small sample size, but I can't help but wonder if it's part of a larger trend when it comes to meeting people and how portions of society meet and date. Perhaps there are bars where single straight men and women meet over 1-2 drinks and talk, but I haven't seen any so far.

Overall, I think the Internet and cars (decreasing population density and increasing the space between third places) has had a dramatically negative impact on love and friendships in places like the US.

this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
335 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

61300 readers
3606 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS