382
submitted 2 weeks ago by ElfWord@lemmy.world to c/pcgaming@lemmy.world

"All of this work is broadly applicable to the PC platform, and it’s going to continue to expand over time. Supporting multiple platforms, multiple chipsets, controllers for different machines that are out there and even ones that aren’t out yet."

[...] Valve's goal with the OS is to have it compatible with traditional PCs, laptops, portable consoles and any other formats.

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 119 points 2 weeks ago

OK, we'll, we're not having a great experience on windows, are we?

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 60 points 2 weeks ago

That's what they're implying

[-] inlandempire@jlai.lu 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So there IS a problem, valve 😡

[-] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

Replace Windows with masochism. If someone enjoys masochism, who are we to stop them?

[-] daddy32@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

This is really nice comparison. Using windows really is a masochism, not only in terms of suffering you take but also having this huge dominant corpo figure inflicting said suffering with new inventive methods day by day.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 69 points 2 weeks ago

That’s pretty much the difference of philosophy in a nutshell.

Microsoft: We gotta kill the competition.

Valve: We gotta make our customers happy.

[-] gray@pawb.social 42 points 2 weeks ago

Valve makes money whether you use windows or Linux - that’s probably more their attitude.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

I mean sure, but you could definitely conceive a Microsoft/Google/Apple style business model where they try to lock people into an ecosystem where they control both sides — the OS and the software — so that the OS can discourage third-party software and the software offers benefits for using the OS where they have home field advantage.

They don’t really need to, cuz they’re the de facto standard for Windows anyway. Specifically because they never went the Microsoft way. So now their OS is just another nice perk instead of another way to control their customers. And it’s also way cheaper for Valve this way.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 58 points 2 weeks ago

Do your thing Valve. Linux has been around for 30 years. It's a marathon to 70% marketshare, not a sprint.

[-] peto@lemm.ee 30 points 2 weeks ago

SteamOS is all well, and good, but does it have a dedicated button to launch an AI app (but not the one you can use at work) that can be reprogrammed to only do other things that also don't need a dedicated button? I think not. Check and mate Gabe.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

the other thing that drives me nuts about steamos is that it doesn’t even come with a dedicated chat button pinned in the bottom bar. and even if it did, i bet it would support work accounts and personal accounts. windows knows exactly what i want, which is a giant button that only supports personal accounts for the chat program is literally only ever used for work

[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 weeks ago

It’s funny in a way, seeing as how Gabe Newell was at Microsoft from ~’83 until ‘96, working on the early versions of Windows.

Makes sense though - to see what subsequent teams have done to your original project, and feel the need to ‘right those wrongs’.

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Windows: 95
Gabe: imma head out

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t think that has anything to do with it

[-] lordnikon@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

It other words they are saying be better or we will destroy you.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

They're saying that they won't even have to try.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

SteamOS: You're saying I can destroy Windows?

Gabe as Morpheus: No, SteamOS. I'm saying when you're ready, you won't have to.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

They say that as if trying to kill Windows is a bad thing.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It’s about having a plan B incase MS starts locking in the customers into their own gaming services.

Tim Sweeney warned about this when they tried to push the Windows Store on Windows 10.

[-] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago

All this talk about a gaming centric operating system "replacing" one designed to handle everything is just ridiculous.

[-] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Gaming on windows is about gaming on the os I already have for work/non gaming entertainment. I'm not out choosing different os like buying a new shirt or something.

If my gaming handheld came with steam os that's fine because I'm not doing productivity work on there.

These days I barely interact with the os outside of clicking the icons to open things. Os have become increasingly desktop only environments. I barely even use the start menu anymore.

[-] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

These days I'm trying to remember what I found so useful with the start menu back on XP and 7. Maybe the problem is Microsoft making it less useful and full of ads.

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Remember when you had to install things and not just open a bookmark in a web browser.

I hate that now I have to make weird registry changes to get rid of ads and disable searching the Internet when all I want is to find the installed application.

[-] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ah yes. They made the search feature useless. E: I remember they made it better a couple years ago but that was too little too late

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You used to have to fix shit back in the day. Now for 99.99% of things in 99.99% of cases windows just works.

But they build an architectural masterpiece and then plastered it with billboards.

[-] noverby@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Correct the purporse isn't killing Windows, it is just a neat side-effect

[-] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

if there's a good user experience on Windows, there's no problem

Oof burn

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Everybody here is debating whether Valve is trying to crush windows.

I took it more to mean that Valve realizes that Windows is the dominant PC OS and so they're trying not to appear as if their goal is to crush Windows, on account of how if that's their goal Microsoft could just make Steam inaccessable on Windows.

Now you could argue that there will be a patch, and a hack and blah blah blah the average user ain't got time fo none-a-dat!

User installs steam. Windows blocks installation. 70% of users just give up. "Oh, I guess this only runs on steamdeck. Oh well."

And just like that Valve loses 100% of potential purchases from that average windows user who hasn't even done so much to their system as changing the theme.

[-] EldritchFeminity 8 points 2 weeks ago

Personally, I think Valave has no reason to try to compete with Windows right now, regardless. Steam has a market capture that the Xbox store could only dream of, even with gamepass, and SteamOS expands their market into new areas outside of the Windows PC group.

I could also see a Streisand effect/TikTok to Red Note if Microsoft tried to prevent people from installing Steam where they draw more attention to SteamOS and people start jumping ship for other options - whether that's SteamOS or not.

[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

So Valve is Trying to make a Alternative Platform and not to rely on Microsoft, I see.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Is a user has a good experience with windows, this user needs his or her head examined. Alternatively, put this user behind glass and exhibit him or her in a museum.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I think you'll find more people who don't even know what an operating system is than people who know enough about computers to identify windows as a problem.

[-] FatCat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago
this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
382 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

6756 readers
1 users here now

Rule #1: Be civil

Rule #2: No spam, memes, off-topic, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #3: No advertisements

Rule #4: No streams, random gameplay videos, highlights, or shorts

Rule #5: No erotic games or porn

Rule #6: No facilitating piracy

Rule #7: No duplicates

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS