657
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Excited to see a huge investment in PR for corporate leadership in the next few years. Like Shark Tank and Undercover Boss weren't saccharine enough. You're going to get the Full Israel of media coverage soon.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

I haven't watched a lot of Shark Tank, but it wasn't doing a lot to endear billionaires to me. But given how little I watched, I may not be the target demographic.

[-] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 26 points 3 days ago

Why are CEOs getting special treatment? don't they already get paid enough to afford personal security?

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 25 points 3 days ago

So these virtual meetings are held any time anyone in New York gets murdered, right? No?

[-] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 days ago
[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Isn't clear, but also will include law enforcement of assorted varieties.

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 10 points 2 days ago

There's more than one variety of class traitor?

[-] A7thStone@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

It's like Baskin Robins, there are multiple flavours of class traitors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 20 points 2 days ago

“Demonization of corporate executives is not new.”

I wonder why that is.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

Reminds me of a great way to put it I read somewhere on Lemmy the other day:

Nobody is vilifying billionaires. It's just not possible. You can't vilify someone when they're already a villain

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

State assistance for corporate security

If we don't take the funds from healthcare budget, then Iran will win.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago

“Demonization of corporate executives is not new”

Right - they’ve been demons for a long time, and we literally had to invent the FTC to curb these robber barons’ lust for power over 100 years ago. They’ve been working steadily ever since to erode that protection and exploit us even further. Demons, the lot of ‘em.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 days ago

How stupid can they get? All of this is reinforcing the perception (read "fact") that violence against corporate executives has significant impact and instantly makes you famous (or infamous). Is what they are doing really the best course of action given the oversupply of people in America with easy access to guns that also feel powerless and disenfranchised? Anyone can see how this has the makings of becoming a recurring thing.

I am not weeping over it, but it is a little shocking to see how poorly they are handling all of it.

[-] Kitathalla@lemy.lol 1 points 2 days ago

And yet nothing is really going to come of it. I guarantee you this will be swept under the rug as soon as they can get kids back in school and schedule the next shooting. The fuckers at the top won't see another real threat.

[-] ramsorge@discuss.online 15 points 3 days ago

Gosh, where and when is this group of 175 people going to be?

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[-] hOrni@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Think of the CEOs. Think about them when buying a gun. Think about them when sharpening a hatchet. Think of them, when building a guillotine...

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

when building a guillotine...

There's a guy on tiktok that actually did this, built an actual working guillotine I mean.

Don't ask me for his handle, I don't remember and I don't use tiktok. He came up in my youtube shorts a while back.

[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

If Kathy is the one calming the CEOs it sounds like she'd be the next target as part of Operation Scrooge.

[-] Talaraine@fedia.io 12 points 3 days ago

Or they could, you know, just stop being dicks.

[-] promitheas@programming.dev 7 points 2 days ago

I thought it was the onion for a second there, but nope it's t a real article

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

They could have voted for Cynthia Nixon.

New York wanted these assholes.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

They could have voted for Cynthia Nixon.

Yes, and they should have.

New York wanted these assholes.

Probably not, no.

You see, propaganda is much more effective than most people know or are willing to admit, and New York, being the largest media market in North America, is a very clear example of that.

You don't have to be an idiot to be swayed by effective messaging, and messaging doesn't have to make sense to be effective.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

You don’t have to be an idiot to be swayed by effective messaging

Actually a fair and salient point. You're not wrong.

[-] el_bhm@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Maybe pull the bootstraps or something?

[-] daylong_seismic@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago
[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
657 points (100.0% liked)

Antiwork

3729 readers
54 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS