a high speed railyard in China (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 year ago by emizeko@hexbear.net to c/urbanism@hexbear.net

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

So-called urbanists adding just one more lane. 🙄

[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

mmmmm

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

There's more high speed rail - as in tracks - in that photo then there is in the entire US. Am I right? Doesn't the US have zero miles of high speed rail?

[-] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

in typical amerikkkan fashion I think we redefined what constitutes high speed so that some of ours meet that definition, but otherwise yea you right

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

But at what cost

[-] Antiwork@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Tag this please. That’s beautiful

[-] Owl@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

I don't think that's a safe following distance for any train, let alone a high speed one.

spoiler

Yes I know that's not how railyards work.

[-] ultraviolet@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

china bad

[-] sexywheat@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yo someone please explain to my dumb ass how passengers can embark/disembark these trains even though they are squished together so close thinkin-lenin