47

arguably (prove me wrong!) one of stallones best movies.

the entire subsequent rambo franchise feels like a farce compared to the original.. they dont even feel part of the same universe.

gritty.. realistic without being over the top (remember that one?!). a good movie makes you feel, and this movie makes me so angry. the revenge is almost justified.

being the early 80s the political fallout of vietnam was still hot on everyones minds. ostracized vets a serious reality.

the small town redneck sheriff always makes for a great villain. that ignorant evil is a valid antagonist even today. brian dennehy was amazing. you just want to punch him in the face. if you look close you can spot a baby faced david caruso.

so what do you peeps think of this masterpiece?

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Loved this movie. And they should never have made any sequels.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Stone cold classic. Can't speak for everyone else, but for me and my little friends, it really shaped how we saw Vietnam vets as victims. I'd go as far as to say it pumped GenX with the unconditional love we have for vets. Didn't want to be guilty of that shame again.

All the actors knocked it out the park. Every scene was so natural, yet the shit that went down was so inevitable. OK, Colonel Troutman overacted it all a bit, but he clearly told us who John Rambo was.

spot on!

OK, Colonel Troutman overacted it all a bit, but he clearly told us who John Rambo was.

oh yeaaaah im rewatching it right now and youre absolutely correct.. troutman does get a bit... theatrical.

[-] dingdongitsabear@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

the film is and was awesome with the only weak spot being the inexplicably overdramatic crenna, it's cringe-inducing whenever he starts to speak. the sequels are nothing short of idiotic, starting with the headband - he wore the thing as a bandage and somehow it became his identity.

do yourself a favor and read the book. the characters are downright psychotic, the lot of them. way less action and more introspective explorations of two men descending into their own private hell, getting crazier by the hour. morell wrote it after watching reels from vietnam and talking to psychotic vets.

tarantino quipped once that he'd like to do the book, with adam driver as rambo and kurt russel as sheriff.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

tarantino quipped once that he’d like to do the book, with adam driver as rambo and kurt russel as sheriff.

This would be amazing.

tarantino quipped once that he'd like to do the book, with adam driver as rambo and kurt russel as sheriff.

that sounds freakin amazing. too bad tarantino is artificially limiting his own career

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

Stallone made great first movies. It's sequels that he kinda sucked at.

I'd say it's a tie between First Blood and Rocky for his best performance for sure, with Rocky being a little better as a movie overall.

Tbh though, he squandered his ability as an actor chasing being an action star. First Blood was the last movie he made that had any real acting in it.

I'm not saying that he didn't do good action movies, he did, and he still kinda does. It's the acting part that he started phoning in. Even in the Rocky series, the second one was half-assed acting compared to the first, and it went schlocky after that. It's like he was doing a caricature or impression of Rocky rather than seriously acting.

Now, again, as an action star, he was top tier. He had the moves, the look, and just enough skill to make characters pop a little.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I thought he was going back to the "real acting" parts when he did Cop Land with Deniro. He was really good in Cop Land.

But it didn't really make a splash and he went back to action movies. :/

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 4 points 3 days ago

For the readers- the guy who wrote First Blood also wrote a book called Creepers and it's fantastic

[-] Forgottengoldfish@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

What do you think of the original ending - where Troutman kills Rambo?

I almost feel like it would have been a more fitting end the character.

What do you think of the original ending - where Troutman kills Rambo?

whatchootalkinbout?! is that on video somewhere or just from the book?!

i would love that ending. the whole movie is him being the last of his kind. that ending would be bleak, but appropriate.. wrapping up the entire debacle. im not sure if im referring to the the movie or the war.

[-] Forgottengoldfish@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago
[-] UniversalMonk@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh wow, that scene also really shows how short Stallone is. I know that he's short in real life, but in the movies you never really notice. It was the first thing I noticed in this scene tho!

awwwesome. think of the world with this ending... no shitty rambo sequels... no farcical references to those movies. hell, stallones career might have taken a different turn.

[-] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

First Blood and the sequels are completely different beasts. Agreed on all counts it is an amazing standalone movie. And the sequels are pure 80s action movie epic cheese. Very similar to the first Rocky movie and its sequels (II to IV)

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2123 readers
177 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS