1063
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 245 points 2 months ago

Is "dragged" the new "slammed"?

[-] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Where I'm from, "dragged" means to be removed against your will.

You know, like "the pitcher got dragged after the first inning".

[-] CheeryLBottom@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

It's a refreshing change of pace

[-] zqps@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago

I was hoping a horse was involved.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cdf12345@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah, you know, like “Dragon Deez”

[-] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago
[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ligma Deez

hehe gottem

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] db2@lemmy.world 151 points 2 months ago

Implying he gives a shit. The thing about people who lack any empathy is they're immune to embarrassment even when they're the most embarrassing human on the planet.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 56 points 2 months ago

Chatbots can't "admit" things. They regurgitate text that just happens to be information a lot of the time.

That said, the irony is iron clad.

[-] ugjka@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Fed up with people who anthropomorphize statistical software

[-] KyuubiNoKitsune 7 points 2 months ago

Fancy predictive text

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 54 points 2 months ago

The ultra powerful see us as NPCs, and nothing more.

Your anger is barely a pop up window on the game they're playing.

[-] Cossty@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yep, Muskrat is playing Frostpunk and completely ignores anything that doesn't make him money.

Edit: Actually, not a very good comparison. Because in Frostpunk, you are actively fighting for your survival. Elon probably doesn't even know what that means.

[-] moseschrute@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

OK, but wow, even barely pop-up windows are still infuriating

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zementid@feddit.nl 33 points 2 months ago

Well then they will have to train their Ai with incorrect informations... politically incorrect, scientifically incorrect, etc.... which renders the outputs useless.

Scientifically accurate and as close to the truth as possible never equals conservative talking points.... because they are scientifically wrong.

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

He lies to assert power. In his company yesmen say yes because he pays their checks. To the rest of us he generally looks like a loon.

It's obvious to a daft AI.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

And we have to ask ourselves WHY he'd want to spread misinformation. What is he trying to do?

[-] boomzilla@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] theluddite@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is an article about a tweet with a screenshot of an LLM prompt and response. This is rock fucking bottom content generation. Look I can do this too:

Headline: ChatGPT criticizes OpenAI

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

To add to this:

All LLMs absolutely have a sycophancy bias. It's what the model is built to do. Even wildly unhinged local ones tend to 'agree' or hedge, generally speaking, if they have any instruction tuning.

Base models can be better in this respect, as their only goal is ostensibly "complete this paragraph" like a naive improv actor, but even thats kinda diminished now because so much ChatGPT is leaking into training data. And users aren't exposed to base models unless they are local LLM nerds.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Mac@mander.xyz 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

God, i love LLMs. (sarcasm)

They will say anything you tell them to and you can even lead them into saying shit without explicitly stating it.
They are not to be trusted.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago

Come on guys, this was clearly the work of the Demtards hacking his AI and making it call him names. We all know his superior intellect will totally save the world and make it a better place, you just gotta let him go completely unchecked to do it.

/s

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 months ago

not so funny thing to say anymore, since there are people who would say stuff like this seriously

[-] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Damn thats hard. And Melon Husk will soon be the new Chef of Nasa!

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

Actually they made a new department of "Government Oversight" for him...

Which sounds scummy, but it's basically ju8st a department that looks for places to cut the budget and reduce waste... not a bad idea, except it's Right Wingers running it so "Food" would be an example of frivolous spending and "Planes that don't fly" would be what they're looking to keep the cash flowing on

[-] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

That sounds almost worse .__. At least with Musk behind the desk.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

With Musk what he'd see as wasteful is... anything that isn't his fucking kickbacks or programs that make his ex-wife start returning his calls.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Which ex-wife exactly? There are just too many…

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago

Elon Mush: too rich to care.

ok ok, Mostly too rich to care, he's pretty thin skinned.

Seriously though, when he was forced to complete the purchase of twitter, I thought he was just an idiot who couldn't run a company. Over the years, I've come to believe that he's an idiot who doesn't care about anything but staying rich and none of the really stupid stuff he's doing pushes the needle.

He's still an idiot, but if it doesn't break him, he just wants the attention and more opportunities to make more money.

[-] andallthat@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I don't think Musk would disagree with that definition and I bet he even likes it.

The key word here is "significant". That's the part that clearly matters to him, based on his actions. I don't care about the man and I don't think he's a genius, but he does not look stupid or delusional either.

Musk spreads disinformation very deliberately for the purpose of being significant. Just as his chatbot says.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
1063 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

61203 readers
3606 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS