777
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] portuga@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Unlovable women vow to keep men who wouldn’t approach them with a stick away from them

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] LouNeko@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I've been living that lifestyle for the past *checks notes* all my life. I'll give them about 2 years before they want to off themselves.

[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I volunteered for this lifestyle after trying dating post divorce. I'd rather cut a leg off and swim with sharks than date nowadays. And bringing CHILDREN into this meat grinder? Hard pass.

[-] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 8 points 4 months ago

Date who you want. Do what you think is best. But it's weird that abortion is so often posited as a gender question when race is a better predictor. If white women stop voting for Republicans all of our rights would be safe.

Talk to your mothers and aunts, the rest of us can't outvote them yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MooseTheDog@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Just some money making drama any news site can run for clicks. Obviously this won't make a difference in anything. Nothing about it is constructive, which definitely makes it poignant, but will never garner wider support.

Kill your local heroin dealer.

[-] vordalack@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

This is a childish and illogical response to what’s been happening. The 4B movement isn’t practical to achieve its desired affects.

A better approach is for white women to have more interracial relationships. It drives the right wing voting base insane when you do that. Black or Chinese men create the most seethe and butthurt.

This way, women still get to have sex, form loving relationships, have children, and not suffer from the consequences of 4B.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 months ago

ok so. I like the concept, it's a good way to move.

HOWEVER there is one big problem. We can't use this emotionally inflammatory rhetoric, because it's what the right thrives on. You can quote me on this later, but i guarantee you if the right sees this they will call it "sexual eugenics" or something stupid.

literally all you have to do to make this a fully marketable and unbeatable position is to treat it like econ 101. Social interaction is most often based on simple contractual obligations. Those in question here, have failed, and thus, it is no longer contractually valid.

"the market for sex is simply untenable culturally, and in terms of healthcare, completely fucked. I no longer plan on having casual sex anytime soon" and suddenly it's like 50x more reasonable and palatable than the previous statement.

and before anybody tells me "oh well it's good for attention and marketing" yeah, if you want to spread the entirely wrong message. just look at the bear vs man debacle that happened a while ago.

~~although you have to be careful because the right will probably just tell you that this is the point, at least the religious part of it, in which case being inflammatory isn't going to do shit anyway. Tough times we live in now, i guess.~~

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Good, overpopulation is a problem anyway, people volunteering not to have children seems pretty helpful for that. Same with mgtow

[-] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

Overpopulation is not a problem

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] skintillion@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Till they replace them with easily controllable migrants

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Hardcore Trump fans will still fuck and procreate. I don't consider sex abstinence a viable long-term strategy.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

it didn't work in South Korea. have you seen incel forums? they're fueled by their imagined persecution by women. this will only solidify their positions.

[-] b34k@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

South Korea has as a staggeringly low birth rate, well below the replacement rate. Even if it doesn’t change the minds of men today, in the long run it will help shape the population in significant says.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 6 points 4 months ago

Bold of them to imagine they’ll keep the right to withhold consent in the new regime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 5715@feddit.org 6 points 4 months ago

Ah yes, more rules.

I want more options to autonomously choose, not more rules. Also we already had this several times, sex-negative feminism, straight edge etc.

This is reactionary.

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Ok, puts flame suit on but that’s just one way for liberals to go extinct.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
777 points (100.0% liked)

politics

21725 readers
4901 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS