183
submitted 11 months ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 77 points 11 months ago

Software parents are such absolute horseshit.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 25 points 11 months ago

I mean if they help children grow when they have no real parents...

[-] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 51 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

For reference, the allegedly infringing patents are these:

[-] blargbluuk@sh.itjust.works 108 points 11 months ago

How do these not apply to the majority of games, these sound so insanely broad. Patents are so stupid.

[-] Lojcs@lemm.ee 40 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sony has a patent for an input device having two data streams at once

[-] pewgar_seemsimandroid 18 points 11 months ago

usb has more i think.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 70 points 11 months ago

Holy hell.

Even by the standard of "all software patents are nonsense", these are a fucking joke.

[-] Fisk400@feddit.nu 40 points 11 months ago

It basically hits any game with mounts or vehicles.

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 34 points 11 months ago

Hold my bacon, one can patent the idea that a game character switches mounts depending on a given state? (Image 3)

[-] Yuki@kutsuya.dev 22 points 11 months ago

Seems like it. So when you come down from the sky on your flying mount and get close to the ground, you swap to a horse mount for example.

How can one patent this.. wtf!

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 19 points 11 months ago

Software patents are fucked, ain't they? You can implement a thing using completely different code, algorithms, hell even programming languages/CPU architectures, and you'd still be infringing. There was some stupid fight over a simple slider UI element to unlock a phone a few years back.

[-] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 12 points 11 months ago

Yeah software patents should be like "this exact code" or something along these lines. I mean patenting "hello world" should give you billions

[-] VonReposti@feddit.dk 6 points 11 months ago

Code is already copyrighted by default, so no need for software patents. Luckily software patents are null and void in EU, so I don't have to worry about that.

[-] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

The solutions here don't seem to really be solutions in my opinion, especially the third one. It's like if the problem a patent solves was "being able to individually package sandwiches on a conveyor belt" and the solution was "have a machine that recognizes where one sandwich ends and another begins so it can stop and start packaging appropriately." Like, no kidding, but how?

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Why are there dates in the corners?

[-] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

These are the patent publication dates, for more details you can check https://patentscope.wipo.int/ with patents 7545191, 7493117 and 7528390

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

These look like they are after Palworld was released. Was Nintendo just sitting on the patent since Pokeman red/blue? What an unintuitive legal system they have over in Japan.

[-] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

How can you infringe on a patent that doesn't exist when you're writing the code?hopefully Palworld can afford the lawyers to kill this off now.

[-] Grangle1@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

So the first two seem to deal with throwing a capture item at a creature (wild pokemon) and/or releasing a character's own creature to fight it (essentially first seen in Legends Arceus, tossing a ball at a pokemon to aggro it and then fighting it with your pokemon). The third one is, as others have said, Mount transitions (at least in pokemon, also first seen in Legends Arceus if you only count ride pokemon; if vehicles are included I believe the first would be Sword/Shield). Though if vehicles are included Nintendo would have a hard time fighting that one. Vehicle transformation, especially in racing games, has been around forever.

[-] Grofit@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

If these were stories I was picking up to implement I would be asking the BA to elaborate some more 😂

[-] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Looking through the first one's content and it seems reasonable? The patent's abstract is supposed to be as widely applicable as legally permitted, so it's like a completely different language on top of legalese.

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 49 points 11 months ago
[-] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Yet people keep buying from them

[-] Buttflapper@lemmy.world 48 points 11 months ago

Can't wait for gamers to completely ignore this and buy their next console and pokémon game

[-] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

I've stopped giving Nintendo money for anything, it's been about 5 years now.

[-] sfxrlz@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Nah fuck them. Got a switch + games. Account hacked. Wrote to tech sup. Nothing but automated answer. Gave that shit away never again

[-] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 11 months ago

Nintendo sues everyone they can because as an IP holder of some seriously valuable properties, everything else in the gaming industry just looks like free real estate for them to colonize. I can make a game called "Dog Fighters" and I'm sure they'll find a way to tell me they own that idea.

[-] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

I curse patents

[-] sardaukar@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I'm kinda sure Palworld's devs are ok with this. Makes them not having to finish the early access game, which their studio has like 4 others to finish anyway.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Oh I haven't played that in a while. Looks like a bunch of updates

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
183 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

75792 readers
1773 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS