121
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by jordanlund@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Final (?) Debate thread before the election in 35 days.

Debate begins at 9 PM Eastern, 6 PM Pacific and runs 90 minutes.

Vice Presidential debates are always tricky since nobody has voted for Vice President in living memory.

Expect Vance to attack Walz on his military service.

Expect Walz to attack Vance on the whole "immigrants eating cats and dogs" thing.

Expect Vance to attack Walz on being an assistant coach, at best.

Expect Walz to roll out "Weird!" at least once.

CBS has announced the burden of fact checking will be on the candidates themselves.

https://apnews.com/article/cbs-debate-vice-president-fact-check-7a3b31c98ab092dd44915df57a359d10

How to watch here:

https://apnews.com/article/cbs-debate-vice-president-fact-check-7a3b31c98ab092dd44915df57a359d10

"How can you watch the VP debate on cable? 

CBS will air debate coverage starting at 8 p.m. ET on CBS broadcast stations and affiliates. Find your local station here.

How can you stream the VP debate without cable? 

The debate can be streamed on the free CBS News app on your connected TV or smartphone, on Paramount+, and all platforms where CBS News 24/7 is available, including CBSNews.com and YouTube. 

Debate coverage on CBS News 24/7 begins at 4 p.m. ET."

Edit Impressive how a debate can go when one participant doesn't have mental health issues! Thanks for coming everybody!

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

"Our number one export cannot be topsoil" - Walz

That is a hell of a good line.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Electric bills are what he thinks Americans are worried about right now? Really?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

Vance: “Our policies aren’t our policies. We actually support your favored policies. You’re not allowed to fact check me. I’ll go back to our real policies tomorrow.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Maybe let’s fund national health care!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

"I don't really want to talk about the 2020 election, so Google sucks and also Tulsi Gabbard and RFK, Jr. likes me."

[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

Guns go from the US to Mexico, not the other way. Another blatant lie.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 14 points 1 month ago

walz is getting so annoyed at vance bald face laws. vance trying to distort walzs own law. man walz is doing a good job of restraining himself though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Morning after thoughts:

  • Walz is not actually a bad debater. He's not polished and practiced, but his command of policy and numbers means he still comes across as fairly confident. He knows what he knows, and that can stand in for polish.
  • Vance didn't do badly, but I genuinely can't remember any of his answers, and that's kind of weird. I think it's because he answered like he'd been raised by a generative AI instead of human parents. Seriously, can anyone actually remember anything he said, without looking it up?
  • Walz had more flubs. But he also got in a lot more hits. It remains to be seen which will stick in the minds of voters more, if either.
  • The lack of Trump on the stage made this one a lot more mature. It's amazing what a difference it makes when one of the debaters isn't a demented man-baby.

The way I see it, Walz's clearly superior command of policy details, and the way that fact-checkers are counting nearly everything Vance said as a lie, gives Walz the technical win, while Vance gets the nod for being more polished. In the end, I don't think this debate will matter much to the election.

Those with an interest in history might remember that back during the 1988 election, Lloyd Bentsen absolutely demolished Dan Quayle, George H.W. Bush's pick for VP, in a debate. But it was forgotten in a matter of days - if not hours - and Bush went on to win handily.

I think this debate will likely be forgotten soon, too.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

"You say trust the experts, but experts are wrong sometimes and Trump thinks with his gut brain and also I have kids." -- Vance

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

FYI, parody accounts are firing up, don't get suckered:

Jack Kimble is a parody account.

https://x.com/JakeSherman/status/1841151195198435344

California doesn't have a 54th district:

https://www.jackkimble.com/home

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/California%27s_congressional_districts

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Geek_King@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

How is it Kamala Harris's policies!? She's not the president! How much power does Vance think the Vice President wields!?

[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Trump WAS president. He didn't fix anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Jd vance: the biggest threat to democracy is censorship

Fucking wild take

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Housing too expensive? DRILL BABY DRILL!!

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Vance just appears like a slick televangelist. Smarmy.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Walz is knocking it out of the park on guns.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Kind of interesting that the "get under his skin" thing is kind being deployed against Walz a bit here. He's not Trump, so he's not flying off the handle, but he's losing his cool occasionally. I actually think that could work in his favor if he can channel it effectively. I think an angry Walz, within reason, could be really effective to counter robo-vance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

"Were not going to fix this listening to experts, we need to listen to common sense." - Running mate of the old man yelling about immigrants eating pets.

[-] ThatOneKrazyKaptain@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Fuck that "I've become friends with school shooters" misspeak is gonna be clipped to hell isn't it

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I feel like Walz's answer re: The ACA is his best response so far.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 1 month ago

you want to help people to afford babies vance. how about funding education nationally with three meals provided each day. oh and maybe healthcare. that would help.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

LOL! "All Trump has said is that he wants to debate whether or not he won the 2020 election." Sure, JD. Sure.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I’m beginning to think he doesn’t even have a family… he brings them up at the weirdest times.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

Fuck you, you don’t know difficult.

I don’t know how much more of Vance’s bullshit I can listen to. And especially his church bullshit. We’re not all young girls (my son is 27) wanting to be livestock in a church community. Some of us are atheists. But I guess I should just go die because I’m not useful anymore.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 1 month ago

ok im getting some chuckles now. vance. "pamela harris as the sitting vice president". well there is a phrase you never hear because the vice president as an advisory role and to continue the polocies if they take over so its not to disruptive. my lucifer he is an idiot (yes I already knew)

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Oh nice! Walz mentioned Wall Street speculators driving up housing prices. Then he literally quoted the Bible.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Does anyone think this "she's the vice president, so why didn't she implement these policies" thing convinces anyone?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

Many women who want families or already have families are devastated by your draconian ‘care’.

How are you wrong? In every single way, Vance. Just like on nearly everything, you have no empathy and can only see black and white when the world is many shades of grey.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Take a shot every time Walz says something reasonable and Vance give the camera that “are you buying this shit” grin.

[-] 7112@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

He's actually checking the timer above the moderators

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Did you know that JD Vance has "three beautiful kids?" Because he's told us three times. I'm wondering if he knows their names.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

Immigrants making almost nothing and sending everything they make (after taxes) back home and living with 10 people in a small apartment are the problem? Not Blackrock and corporate landlords buying everything on the market?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Geek_King@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Vance: Smoke and mirrors, we want to do better.... but we won't.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 11 points 1 month ago

vance keeps going with that bs that obamacare was not working till trump fixed it. it was doing great till they kicked out the leg. they do need ot not allow companies to own more than one leg of healthcare though (looking at you cvs)

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Vance: "We can't tell you what the concepts of the healthcare plan are because it's boring."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] marketsnodsbury@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

“Where is the firewall?!?” Well put, Walz. Well put.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Phew. This debate does not have enough pee breaks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

No kids here, but I have many nieces and nephews, and it makes me so depressed to think of a school run like a police state.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
121 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers
2859 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS