96

Delivering a win for abortion rights advocates, Ohio’s Issue 1 will fail, the Associate Press projects. The Republican-backed ballot initiative would have increased the threshold to amend the state's constitution, making it more difficult for a measure that would enshrine abortion rights into the state's constitution to pass later this year.

A "yes" vote on Issue 1 meant that constitutional amendments, including the abortion amendment, would have needed 60% support, rather than the existing minimum of 50% plus one. The increased threshold would have been put into place immediately if Issue 1 had passed.

Issue 1 also would have created more strict signature requirements for citizen-led measures to appear on the ballot. Currently, organizers must collect a number of signatures equal to 5% of the votes cast in the last gubernatorial election from half of Ohio’s 88 counties. If Issue 1 had passed, organizers would have needed signatures from all 88 counties.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one 26 points 1 year ago

It's almost like the GOP has unpopular policies

[-] xenspidey@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago

The 60% part I think world have been a good thing (look at brexit) 51% deciding things is not necessarily great. It's the rest of the initiative that was bonkers.

[-] darthfabulous42069@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

In other circumstances, I would agree with you, but given the severity of the situation vis-a-vis abortion, we need to accept any victories we get to save innocent people from what is a blatant attempt at sparking a political civil war.

Which is one of the things that is so troubling about the situation. Fundamental questions about our democracy are being sacrificed on the altar of protecting our most basic rights from fascists. That should terrify everyone.

[-] MTLion3@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The Franklin County Board of Elections had this lovely flier in the line for everyone to see and is such a blatant bit of bias I can’t help but laugh at it

[-] wrath-sedan@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I mean this is ridiculous for so many reasons but maybe the saddest/funniest part is that a “no” vote will “end majority rule” or “destroy citizen-led ballot initiatives as we know them” since a “no” vote on Issue one literally just maintains the status quo. It is literally maintaining citizen-led ballot initiatives as you know them.

[-] pantherfarber@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's the argument against the amendment. It's stating that if the amendment passes it would "end majority rule." It's poorly written.

[-] reverendsteveii@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

The federal government and constitution put some guardrails around what states can do, so I'm a bit more okay with states being able to change without the same supermajority as the constitution.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

None of this would even matter if this country wasn't infested with rabid misogynists. This is a victory, but only a small one.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
96 points (100.0% liked)

U.S. News

2243 readers
40 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:

For World News, see the News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS