522

Anyone else have a similar experience with one of these drives?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Offlein@lemmy.world 468 points 1 year ago

What the fuck are all these comments?

It's an article about an unresolved and recurring problem with a popular drive that the ostensibly reputable manufacturer is trying to hide.

But 90% of the comments are people jerking themselves off about how smart they are for using RAID, which is irrelevant to the point of the article... But never miss an opportunity to pleasure yourself in public I guess?

[-] saddlebag@lemmy.world 135 points 1 year ago

Lemmy definitely showing the same symptoms as Reddit as it grows. Too many people trying to show off how technically smart they are and just come off as obnoxious dweebs

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 year ago

I don't know why people think that this behavior would ever be restricted to Reddit, Twitter, Facebook, etc.?

There's one common element in all these systems...

[-] Blum0108@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Just remove the humans and the problem disappears

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

My new preferred social media is just me talking to ChatGPT

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] klyde@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

It's becoming more and more noticeable and it's making me sad.

[-] ffolkes@fanexus.com 31 points 1 year ago

The thing is, there's nothing wrong with sharing knowledge or pointing out best practices. What sucks is people replying JUST to point out the flaws and then gloat, without even fully comprehending what happened in the article. But this behavior has been around way longer than reddit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

I didn't believe you but yeeeeeesh. Lots of self righteous penises ITT. If people buy an expensive hard drive, it should work. Not everyone knows everything there is to know about data storage, have a little grace people

[-] drdabbles@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

What, you don't do RAID-6 and carry around 5 external USB drives to move your data between locations? It's just so convenient. 🤣

Seriously, I don't get the raid comments at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago

Lol this place is half a circle jerk of people who think they're certified geniuses for rejecting mainstream technology, tech hipsters. There was a thread about Google's "safe browsing" thing and most of the comments were just "iMaGiNe UsInG gOoGle!!*

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 19 points 1 year ago

My only counter argument is that the verge article should also have stuck to the failures/defect, and either not mentioned their own dataloss, or at least mention possible mitigation strategies. I understand not everyone can do proper backups, but the verge can, and they should lead by example.

As for a comment on the actual drive defect, this is probably one of those cases where you want to insist on a refund. If the problem is as widespread as claimed, then getting a new defective drive doesn't really help. WD/sandisk should just be recalling and refunding all devices. It's odd that tech stuff never seems to have recalls in the same way that cars do? They seem to just rely on individual RMAs.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] showmustgo@lemmy.world 198 points 1 year ago

This is exactly why I invested 250x the cost of one SSD into my raid setup. It's 100 SSD's in raid1 in a huge rack which slides vertically on 4 guide poles.

I sit under the contraption and lean forward as far as I can, before lowering it onto my back. This method allows me to suck my own cock with ease, so that I don't need to fellate myself on public forums

[-] Rootiest@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

so that I don't need to fellate myself on public forums

But you still do anyway, because you like the way it feels

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nehal3m@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago

I hope you're getting off on redundancy and not a backup. Because RAID.is.not.a.backup.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 69 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


This isn’t a drive he purchased many months or years ago — it’s the supposedly safe replacement that Western Digital recently sent after his original wiped his data all by itself.

SanDisk issued a firmware fix for a variety of drives in late May, shortly after our story.

But data recovery services can be expensive, and Western Digital never offered Vjeran any the first time it left him out to dry.

Honestly, it feels like WD has been trying to sweep this under the rug while it tries to offload its remaining inventory at a deep discount — they’re still 66 percent off at Amazon, for example.

Unfortunately, the broken state of the internet means Western Digital doesn’t have to work very hard to keep selling these drives.

I’d also like to say shame on CNET, Cult of Mac and G/O Media’s The Inventory for writing deal posts about this drive that don’t warn their readers at all.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 62 points 1 year ago

"I have a defective drive, therefore all drives are defective"

Storage can fail at any time, that's why important data should be backed up.

Dunno what more to expect from the Verge. Have they tried putting thermal paste on it?

[-] SeriesOfTubers@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago

Are you willing to accept an article from Ars Technica? https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/05/sandisk-extreme-ssds-keep-abruptly-failing-firmware-fix-for-only-some-promised/

Do you think it's not newsworthy if a manufacturer sells drives with a history of failures, releases a firmware update they claim will fix the issue, sends a replacement drive that also fails, and continues to sell the drives at a deep discount?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] eric5949@lemmy.cloudaf.site 61 points 1 year ago

Did like none of y'all read the article?

We truly are on a Reddit clone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

In the article they point out their first drive failed and sandisk replaced it. Now the replacement is dying in the same way. And the drive just so happens to be on clearance now, as if they’re trying to clear out stock.

Also, it’s an SSD, so it’s not a mechanical failure.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SaltyLemon@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

So they just had this one drive fail and they decided to make a big news article about it? Hardware fails sometimes. Just RMA the thing and shut the fuck up about it. Go build a gaming PC.

[-] ominouslemon@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago

Did you read the article? Two drives, not one. In 3 months. By the same company. Who is aware of a problem, is trying to hide it, and pushed a firmware update that did not work. Also this second drive was a "safer" replacement the company sent the guy after the first one failed. I say an article about the whole situation is fully warranted

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Deniablesummer@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"I put 3TB of irreplaceable data on a single drive, and want to blame anyone but myself for my data loss"

Go away with this garbage.

I personally have a NAS with 12TB striped over 3 drives, I sure wouldn't blame WD if one drive failed and I lost everything.

E: this whole comment section is why tech illiterate people shouldn't really comment on hardware failures like this. The only fact that is know is that the verge faced 2 drive failures and lost 3TB of data due to a lack of safe data storage practices. If they were tech literate they wouldn't have lost any data.

The verge did not confirm the mode of failure, and therefore the second failure could've been completely unrelated to the firmware issue. Nobody knows anything, other than the verge needs to educate themselves on how to properly store irreplaceable data.

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

The claim here seems to be that the product has an unusual failure rate, the manufacturer has acknowledged the original problem and released a fix, and it does not appear to be fixed. I don't read it as a sob story about some reporter's lost data.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] InfiniteStruggle@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

Ooh ooooh look at me everybody I'm so much smarter than this IDIOT that expected the devices he PAID FOR to work as advertised and the company to be honest and straightforward with firmware issues and updates

I run this better system than NORMIES and even if it fails (because I'm an idiot) I DONT CARE ABOUT THE DATA on them because iT DiDn'T mATteR tO Me iN tHe fIrSt PlAcE.

PS For people wondering about the second paragraph, check this guy's other comments in this thread.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] walnutwalrus@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago
[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago

Yes, actually.

I do have multiple redundancy set up , but I've had many a sandisk drive fail, and a few wd my passports too. Now, the WDs were refurbs that I throw media on for the home network, or plugging into my shield, or like that. So I am never surprised when they just don't work one day.

But the sandisk were brand new, and failed within weeks. It made me give up on the brand entirely. I just don't like having to deal with my backups failing at that kind of rate. They are good about replacing them, but damn. I think I did two swaps on the one drive, three on another, and then just demanded a refund from the third. The one I use on my dad's computer was the triple fail, and we finally got one that's stayed working for a while now.

The other died after six months and I just trashed it and gave up.

I've also had horrible experiences with sandisk sd cards. They could be fakes, what with having bought them via amazon though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] scripthook@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’ve been telling people for years that the entire 21st century is at risk of being a lost century. Even personally I can’t guarantee my data will be with me 20 years from now even though I back it up. If you care about a photo or document, print it and throw it it a box. As I get older I find more of an obsession with physical media from a preservation point of view. Because I know my books and pictures will be around 50 years from now. Digital files not so much.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 18 points 1 year ago

I used to think this, but now, less so.

I agree with you in general, as most people don't use physical media. However, those of us that do, are probably pretty secure in our legacy.

I have digital files that have been with me for over a quarter of a century, first through repeated copies to new media formats, then to more sophisticated backup systems. In the past few years, I've been alternating backing up to cloud services and then to local USB disks; the backup program is a statically compiled, monolithic program with few dependencies. Recently, I found a solution to the encrypted restore by survivors. I even have a README with instructions.

I'm secure in the knowledge that my 3TB of painstakingly curated collection of foot porn will be available to future researchers, for the betterment of mankind.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Intralexical@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I’ve been telling people for years that the entire 21st century is at risk of being a lost century. Even personally I can’t guarantee my data will be with me 20 years from now even though I back it up. If you care about a photo or document, print it and throw it it a box. As I get older I find more of an obsession with physical media from a preservation point of view. Because I know my books and pictures will be around 50 years from now. Digital files not so much.

LOCKSS and KISS, though. Flash chips don't last forever but are pretty durable, and so are optical media as long as they're the right material. SSDs decay and HDDs fail, but for magnetic platter media even if the head or motor crashes there's always the old magnetic microscope in a pinch. USB's not going anywhere, and if you have four or five copies that you don't completely neglect and don't store in the same physical place, presumably you'll have the chance to notice and take corrective measures if any of them start failing or are at risk.

I don't actually know that an individual book or picture will still be around in 50 years; Fire, flooding, insects, acidic paper, low-quality ink maybe— Digital stuff's fragile, but so is physical stuff. Stick it in the attic, and the heat'll speed up any chemical reactions and probably make it cozier for insects; Stick it in the basement, and the condensation will get you mildew and rot. By contrast, having a flash drive accidentally survive a trip through a washer and dryer is a pretty common occurrence, and I've yet to lose a drive even with that level of negligence. Material compatibility's one of the very most basic parts of a set of very precise manufacturing techniques, tin whiskers seem pretty rare these days, the really scarily insidious stuff like hydrogen embrittlement is super improbable, and most biological forms of decay haven't adapted to eating cured epoxy and monocrystalline silicon yet.

At least I sorta know how a flash cell or hard drive platter is meant to be structured; Who knows what weird organic reactions and unstable or slowly diffusing molecules are happening in the pile of chemical pigments on a sheet of likely-acidic bleached cellulose and cheap ink or toner, and whether it will still be legible to human eyes in however many years? Plus, a printed photo or document starts fading the very instant it's created, and it gets a little worse every time you touch it with sweaty human hands or look at it while exhaling moist human breath and corrosive enzymatic saliva droplets under a white LED lamp or G-type star shooting out ionizing UV rays. Digital failures tend to be catastrophic, but at least up until the moment it fails, you can make sure that it is the exact same picture or text— And you can make many, many copies very cheaply, all of them very physically durable compared to paper, and know that they are all the exact same picture and text.

That said, I absolutely agree with your overall assessment that most of the information in the early 21st century, including most of the public Internet/WWW, most likely either will be or already is… Maybe not technically lost, per se, given how much caching and saving happens on private clients, but certainly rendered inaccessible.

Ideally I'd really love to see a return of microfiche, actually, using modern polymers and metallization. I've been meaning to look into that for a while now. At a reasonable scale for optical viewing, you could fit… much, much more content than you might expect, and do it several times over, in an entirely reasonable number of pages. Your comment actually spurred me to finally think of a practical way of printing that— for years before, I'd been trying to idly figure out a process based on photomasks and nanoparticles suspended in resin, which had always felt like a very messy and tricky idea, but I just thought of another idea– So thanks for providing some inspiration there.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Ugh, I literally just fucking bought this drive

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Reygle@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

I was today years old when I learned places like TheVerge are filled with idiots who keep work on USB media, keep no backups, and act like it's not their fault when something fails.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 15 points 1 year ago

Randomly disconnects = chance for data loss

Though the filesystem plays a role. I have a full metal body Sandisk USB stick that still overheats after a while and then disconnects (has a heatsink on top now) but ext4 handles that fine. I know that Fat32 has no journaling and NTFS is a tad bit sensible to disconnects. Don't know about exfat.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
522 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60236 readers
3052 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS