105
submitted 3 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/usa@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago

Well its in the news so it worked. Protest is literally one of the only thing that's ever actually effected change in this country so stick with it. The more people it pisses off, the better. If a protest leaves people feeling safe and comfortable, it wasn't a protest, it was a parade.

[-] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

Nah, the message is getting lost in the delivery. I support BLM too but had the same issue with their freeway-blocking tactics. Nobody is going to swing to your side of the argument because you blocked their route home...nobody. People have emergencies, parents and kids need to get places...people have important jobs and need to be able to get to work such as doctors, first responders, air traffic controllers etc etc.. Yes, Gaza and BLM are both worthy causes but there are many other worthy causes as well. You can't block traffic for every worthy cause...block people from living their lives to put what you personally feel is the most important social issue at the top of their world by forcing it on them through essentially trapping them. It's just plain wrong and nothing is going to change that. Yes what's going on in Gaza is more wrong, and yet it's still illogical af and morally wrong to pretend that this provides justification to trap people on freeways.

[-] warbond@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Is there anything you feel strongly enough about to protest like that?

In trying to look at it from the perspective of "what could make me do that" I can only think of some downright heinous shit. To get to the point that you're willing to stand in front of cars and have people hate you for preventing them from living their lives? It's pretty hard to imagine.

And on top of that, to know that your actions are going to ruin you in some way or another; that you're facing jail time, bodily harm, or extreme financial burden? Either they're being both sensitive and stupid or they're so fed up that they feel like there's no other recourse. It's insane to me to think about being pushed so far that that seems like a good idea.

But then I think about how they must have gotten there, and the things that would get me there, and they're not so different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

If you think the point of disruptive protest is to win people to your side you are an idiot. The point is to make society stop working.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What exactly is it accomplishing? You think anyone is unaware of Gaza at this point? People don't care to be blunt. Pissing people off just makes life a little more miserable for people who have nothing to do with the issue.

Blocking traffic in Israel would make a much bigger difference.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 months ago

"Americans will tolerate anything [(even genocide)], provided it doesn't block traffic."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Because West Los Angeles is just full of people who have any say about what happens in Gaza... 🙄

[-] Gabadabs 27 points 3 months ago

What's happening in Gaza is being directly funded by all of our taxes, there's not a particular location that the protesting needs to be done, it just needs to be done.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

If you want to protest tax dollars, take it to the Mall in D.C. and shut down their infrastructure.

If you actually care about what's happening in Gaza, take it to Tel Aviv.

Anything else is a pointless "look at me!" protest.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 months ago

lol “if you wanna protest, literally travel across the whole ass country or the world. Nothing local matters.”

You’re either a supporter of Israel or you don’t know history. I can’t think of any other way to get to what you just posted.

So do you support Israel or do you not understand how every expansion of civil rights in the 20th and 21st century were won?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Local very much matters, for local issues. See the protests directly in Ferguson for example.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferguson_unrest

The related protests outside Ferguson accomplished fuck all.

If the issue is an international issue, a local protest means and accomplishes NOTHING other than a mild inconvenience for people completely unrelated to the problem.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

You don’t think the nationwide protests and international reaction to the killing of Michael brown had any effect.

Would you say there was any effect when politicians and police in areas outside furgeson had to make statements in response to the protests in their regions?

Do you think catapulting blm to the national level and international recognition had any effect?

Since you said a local protest means nothing if the issue is international do you think that the various anti war protests throughout Americas 20th and 21st centuries have meant anything?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Gabadabs 16 points 3 months ago

Not everyone can just ship themselves off to DC and like, shut down infrastructure. Let alone travel internationally. Being in a financial position where you can do that is an incredibly privileged position to be in. We have to do what we can, where we are to make change - and for people living in LA that means protesting in LA. A lot of protesting IS about visibility, and doing it so you can be noticed is far from pointless! Blocking traffic anywhere in this country is directly making sure that you and your message cannot be ignored.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Not everyone can be part of an effective protest then...

[-] Gabadabs 6 points 3 months ago

You really haven't established that that's the case. Wherever you protest, you're getting visibility and costing the state money to manage.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

lemmmy.world strikes again

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 months ago

Especially telling as they mod politics and news comms there

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Local and state governments absolutely have a say through their investments to Israel. It's just as important to pressure them for divestment as the federal government and corporations on the BDS list.

Not only are state and local lawmakers more accessible to constituents than federal lawmakers, but local investment portfolios also hold billions of dollars in funding to Israel sourced from the everyday taxes of community members. State and local governments across the U.S. hold more than $4 trillion in all investments in their investment portfolios. At least $1.6 billion in Israel Bonds is held between state governments, municipal governments, and public pension funds nationwide. Those investment dollars come from every individual, household, and business within the municipal or state borders that pay property taxes, income taxes, and sales taxes, making them some of the most representative pools of dollars invested on behalf of the public. Saper says that campaigns targeting the investment of these local dollars “invite people to reckon with how implicated we are here at home with the atrocities we are witnessing abroad.”

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

The people screaming for divestment have no idea what's involved. In many cases there are contractual obligations that make it impossible.

The people screaming for it have no idea how any of it works, they just want it stopped and will continue to get angry when it doesn't.

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is nonviolent civil disobedience to protect the financial support of an ongoing genocide. Acting like this isn't a valid form of protest or that the BDS movement have "no idea what's involved" when putting pressure on corporations and institutions to Divest is ridiculous.

These kind of protests do put pressure and bring the issue to the forefront of the local and state administrative bodies. The BDS movement was successful in the divestment of Apartheid South Africa, this isn't too different

“Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue,” King wrote. “It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored.”

  • MLK Jr. on the nature of nonviolent protests
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

MLK protested where the offenses were actually happening. That's why they were effective.

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Yeah dude, that's why the anti-apartheid protests and BDS movement in the United States were so unsuccessful and not effective when it came to South Africa

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

The offenses are actually happening in the US, too. That's where the voters voting for genocide enablers are located, that are sending all the bombs to Gaza to blow up schools and hospitals.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

I'm sorry, hundreds of thousands of innocent children. This piece of paper says it's impossible to stop paying for you to be murdered.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Pretty much, that's how "contractual obligations" work.

In my state, we've been trying to get the state Public Employees Retirement System to divest from oil investments for a few decades now. The big problem is PERS is tied up with contractual obligations to provide a specific return on investment, a return which can't be made if they dump fossil fuels:

https://www.opb.org/article/2024/02/07/oregon-retirement-fund-carbon-neutrality/

The folks supporting divestment think it's like a light switch. "Well, just STOP!" and it doesn't work that way.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It literally does just work that way. A piece of paper is a piece of paper. "But we won't make as much money" is the part that holds it together. Contracts and laws in general are no more or less than a pretext to exercise class power. They're broken at will in other contexts. The US was literally founded on it.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Tell me you don't understand how a contract works without telling me you don't understand how a contract works.

There are legal liabilities for breaking a contract. It's not that simple.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Tell me you don't interact with people without a keyboard without telling me [useless repetition]. Fucking weirdo.

Yes it is that simple. The law is, and only is, a mechanism for people with power to exercise that power under the veil of legitimacy. Ask any Indian tribe. Ask anyone with x amount of money attempting to litigate a contract with someone with 1000x amount of money.

The reality of the system cannot be disputed without looking like a fucking joke.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Ahh yes. Gatekeeping of what is considered valid protest and white liberalism, name a more iconic duo.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

An effective protest reaches the hearts and minds of people who can actually have an impact.

Protesting in L.A. does neither of those things.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

I'm 100% disinterested in your opinion of what you consider a valid protest.

What you or I consider a valid protest is irrelevant unless we organized it.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Fine, tell me who in LA on the 405 freeway can stop investment in Israel. It's cool... I'll wait.

Oh, right, nobody. They are protesting to nobody so they can feel good about themselves while not actually having a chance at changing anything.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue_signalling

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performative_activism

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Since you seem to lack reading comprehension.

I’m 100% disinterested in your opinion

I'm not interested in the opinions of reactionaries masquerading or deluding themselves into thinking they are revolutionaries.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Well you chose to be in a thread literally about reactionaries masquerading or deluding themselves into thinking they are revolutionaries...

[-] verdigris@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Freeway shutdowns are one of the only actually effective nonviolent protests available to modern civilians, as they disrupt industry. Also these people consciously risked jail time to stand up for victims of genocide. Calling them performative... Fuck you.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

An effective protest reaches the hearts and minds of people who can actually have an impact.

A more idiotic and ahistoric statement is rarely uttered

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Except every single useless protest ever.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Incoherent doesn't count as more idiotic. Not sure why you're trying for it but please stop.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

This leaves me thinking that maybe we should be protesting our own prison industrial complex this way.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Not sure how shutting down roads has anything to do with Israel, but I'm glad the roads are shut down. If only it could be done permanently.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

The occupied state of Palestine's settler invaders would evaporate overnight without the constant military and financial support of the Great Satan. Harming the economic output of the US is directly in line with opposing the genocide. In fact it's the only thing that will actually work, short of armed struggle.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
105 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7205 readers
288 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS