173

IMO, The US has crumbling infrastructure, corrupt government, dangerous cities, and a lot of homelessness, among so many other problems. Hell, millions of people in the US don’t even have power right now.

What’s the difference?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 100 points 1 year ago

Third World is an outdated term to refer to neutral countries in the cold war.

Unless there was a sudden dramatic shift in US geopolitical policy it would literally be impossible for it to be considered third world, as the very definition of third world as the definition inherently implies that the country in question is not allied with the US and the broader Western World.

Austria and Switzerland were third world, technically Yugoslavia was too. China became third world for a decent stretch after the sino-soviet split since the other half of the definition relies on not being allied with the Soviets in particular.

The use of third world as an insult for poor countries is a neo-colonial mindset that just takes for granted that anyone who isn't an outright ally of the west or of the Russians must just be too poor to be worth considering as anything but uneducated people in dirt houses living subsistence lifestyles and who's main interaction with an apparatus of state is occasionally seeing a humvee loaded up with the child soldiers of this warlord or that drive by.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 91 points 1 year ago
[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Languages evolve over time, all dictionaries now have OPs use of the word as the first definition.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 8 points 1 year ago

What definition and what dictionary?

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/third%20world

Maybe saying all dictionaries is a bit much, I only checked a few.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

USA doesn't fit any of those definitions anyway.

I know what OP means, 3rd world is just not the right word.

USA is a banana republic

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh 100%, I'm just saying his use of the word is in no way wrong like half the comments seem to imply. Everyone knew exactly what he meant and the definition is in most dictionaries.

This seems to pop up everytime the word is used and it's a major pet peeve of mine.

My comment is only aimed at those that think third world only means the historical definition when that hasn't been the case for at least two decades. The word third world is almost always used to mean developing country in day to day conversation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I guess I still go by the original definition. There are other words that offer more detail anyway - kakistocracy, gerontocracy, corporatocracy, kleptocracy, etc.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Developing countries would be the synonym for third world in the definition used by OP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

Because "first world" means NATO, not having a high standard of living.

[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you mean “developped” vs “develloping”.

The HDI of the US is significantly lower than canada or northern europe, but still much higher than the world average.

Here’s an Inequality Adjusted version of the Human Development index, the US comes 27th, below Estonia and Cyprus, but 27th out of nearly 200 is counted as “develloped”.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_inequality-adjusted_Human_Development_Index&diffonly=true

[-] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Also, the "developed" vs. "developing" terminology doesn't really have a category that fits a country that was previously developed and is now declining.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Neoliberal hubris

[-] Nemo@midwest.social 28 points 1 year ago

Because the definition of "first world" is "aligned with the US during the Cold War", second world was aligned with the USSR, third world were countries not significant on the global stage. It correlates with but does not require poverty or dictatorships.

[-] Steve@communick.news 21 points 1 year ago

Several reasons.

  1. The US is largely responsible for defining what 1st, 2nd, and 3rd World countries are.
  2. It has the largest economy in the world.
    (I think? That may have gone to China by now. Not sure. But it was true recently.)
  3. Even with everything you said being true. It's still the wealthiest country in the world, by a large margin. Epically when you compare incomes, lifestyles, and infrastructure to actual 3rd world countries. It's not even close.
[-] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Looks like the USA is still about $10 trillion higher in GDP than China.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because the "third world" doesn't mean what people think it means. It's cold war terminology. First World is western aligned nations, Second World is Eastern bloc, Third World is nonaligned with the eastern or western nations. FBFW it meant nations that generally weren't powerful or wealthy enough to be of interest to either East or West, and that poverty often meant they really had a lot of infrastructure and other problems. That's why we're not "Third World", it's a geopolitical alignment, not a quality of how we treat our citizens and infrastructure. So we're First World even if our country is turning into a shithole in some ways.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago

Because of their GDP. People are incredibly rich there. But one false move and there are no safety nets. You can get bankrupt in an instant.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's mostly the stable government, infrastructure, currency and tech.

Pretty much why I've been calling the US a 3rd world country for years.

Your"IMO" aren't opinions; those are the facts, jack

IMO, no country that primarily uses toilet paper instead of a bidet is 1st world.

[-] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 11 points 1 year ago
[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

My guess is Lemmy skews young.

so many of these revelations and showerthoughts are pretty banal coming of age stuff.

[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The country most famous for the bidet trend is France and currently swimming in the Seine is still looking impossible. If my infrastructure is so shitty and 3rd world here at least my lakes, rivers and water ways are all clean enough for me to use.

Every country has its problems, but calling the US 3rd world is just your brain being full of straight negative propaganda. Simultaneously not every French River is unusable or every country filled with Bidets an actual mark of their progress. Go experience a country first before just talking shit.

Also, stable government?? Literally our biggest problem is that our government has been so stable that it has changed for 240 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Pretty much why I’ve been calling the US a 2nd world country for years.

FYI, "second world" means communist -- or more specifically, Warsaw Pact. Only delusional MAGAs would call the US that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run 8 points 1 year ago

Because of very high GDP per capita. It's another discussion whether GDP is a reliable measure of economy output.

[-] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The Gucci belt

[-] dch82@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

I 100% agree; the thing is they measure this stuff by the mean so a few outliers (rich districts or billionaires) make things look reasonable by number.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Where are you getting this from?

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Because the majority of old people are rich and there are still the echoes of a real middle class. Let's see if Trump gets elected and everyone with the cash to do so flees his outrageous proposed tariffs.

[-] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 1 year ago

TIL: Way too many people think it's still the Cold War. Language changes people.

[-] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Yup, it does change. It was attempted to mean "poor" and it's been reappropriated since

If you're trying to use modern language, it's "developed" and "developing"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Language changes people.

In what ways are people changed by language?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
173 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42649 readers
365 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS