585
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.run 157 points 11 months ago

Google web services take advantage of an API that only Google knows about.

Completely unsurprising. Google should have been given the anti-trust treatment long ago. There's not a saving us because the ones to save us are completely complicit. And people who write independent browsers will be smacked back down by having places like YouTube throttle them.

[-] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 52 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is why we need to all back firefox...

I dont care if the CEO sucks, or if they have some opt-out anti-features....

Chrome monopoly is a far greater threat

[-] Toribor@corndog.social 21 points 11 months ago

Google should have been given the anti-trust treatment long ago

Lina Khan on the horizon looming ominously.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Remember this thumb rule -> if it's not open-source, you are allowing the software to do whatever it wants to do.

No regulation, law, support group is going to help you. You are digging your own grave.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 45 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I agree, but... This was in open source software. Chromium. Not just Google Chrome. https://github.com/chromium/chromium/commit/422c736b82e7ee763c67109cde700db81ca7b443

hangout_services/thunk.js (via) It turns out Google Chrome (via Chromium) includes a default extension which makes extra services available to code running on the *.google.com domains - tweeted about today by Luca Casonato, but the code has been there in the public repo since October 2013 as far as I can tell.

https://simonwillison.net/2024/Jul/9/hangout_servicesthunkjs/

[-] redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 11 months ago

If it's any software you didn't write yourself or audit every line of...

For a typical Linux distro that's tens of thousands of packages...

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago

I am no expert on code-auditing. But I'm slightly at peace that there are 100s of experts looking at the code because it's open-source. But i also understand mistakes can still happen. It's not a perfect system, but it's the best solution so far.

[-] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 11 months ago

There's some truth to that, but bad actors have managed to slip things through in the past. It happened recently with xz.

I guess my point is that we put a lot of trust in strangers when we run any code on our systems. Open or not.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

True. We can also not run code at all and be perfectly safe.

I wish there was a comparison. Number of 0days in open source and 0days in closed source for comparible projects and a measure for time to mitigate the 0days.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

Hopefully no one comes in here and tells me Firefox does shit like this as well... I just swapped back.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
585 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

72319 readers
2390 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS