90
submitted 1 year ago by Woland@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

The International Fencing Federation (FIE) also said it was reinstating Kharlan, allowing her to take part in the team competition at the world championships in Milan.

Emmanuel Katsiadakis, the Greek president of the FIE, said the decision had been taken "after consultation with the International Olympic Committee".

Kharlan, the first fencer to face a Russian or Belarusian since the former's invasion of Ukraine, won 15-7 against Russia's Anna Smirnova on Thursday.

The 32-year-old four-time Olympic medallist refused Smirnova's handshake afterwards, instead offering her sabre to tap blades, but FIE rules state that the two fencers must shake hands.

Smirnova staged a 45-minute protest and refused to leave the competition strip.

Kharlan was disqualified, claiming afterwards that Emmanuel Katsiadakis, the Greek president of the FIE, had even assured her that it was "possible" not to shake hands and offer a touch of her blade instead following her victory.

"I thought I had his word, to be safe, but apparently, no," Kharlan said.

In response to her disqualification, the International Olympic Committee called for Ukrainian athletes to be treated "sensitively".

Then on Friday, IOC President Thomas Bach, a former Olympic fencer himself, sent Kharlan a letter saying she would be guaranteed a place at next year's Olympics in Paris regardless of whether she gained the qualification points.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lasagna@programming.dev 21 points 1 year ago

"Smirnova staged a 45-minute protest and refused to leave the competition strip."

The Russian fencer is basically a toddler.

[-] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To be clear, if she is contesting a ruling by the referee, she is not allowed to leave the piste (strip) until the situation is resolved by the head official(s). As soon as she leaves the piste, she gives up all rights to contest a ruling.

This happened publicly before with Shin A-lam at the 2012 Olympics, where she had to stay on piste for an hour while the officials discussed the ruling.

[-] lasagna@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

So to be clear, she is throwing a tantrum because the Ukrainian contestant didn't want to shake hands with a citizen of the country that has been killing her people?

[-] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Yes. I think this is less a tantrum, and more of a "fuck you" from Smirnova to Kharlan, but your interpretation is fine.

The rules state that the competitors must shake hands at the end of a bout, and that the penalty for refusing to shake hands is a black card. At the beginning of the pandemic, this rule was suspended, and was replaced with saluting and tapping blades. It is not clear whether the handshake rule is back in effect at the international level (which in itself is a huge problem - if athletes can't look up the rules, it's hard to follow them).

As an online observer, these are the facts I was able to gather. At the end of this bout, Kharlan offered her blade for the blade tap, and instead of reciprocating, Smirnova offered her hand for a handshake. Kharlan then left the piste without tapping blades or shaking hands, and Smirnova launched her complaint which (per the rules) required her to remain on piste until the issue was resolved. The officials decided the complaint was legitimate, and black carded Kharlan.

All that follows is my own speculation. Kharlan offered the blade tap but was refused. Depending on whether the handshake rule is officially reinstated (and it seems that many athletes at this particular competition were just tapping blades without a handshake) she may have been able to lodge her own complaint that Smirnova was unwilling to tap blades. They could have just had an old fashioned stand-off, with one fencer extending their blade for the tap and the other extending their hand for the handshake, neither willing to compromise, and it would (probably) have resulted in the referee clarifying the rules without penalty to either fencer. But because Kharlan left the piste without tapping blades and without shaking hands, it left an opening for Smirnova to exploit.

I do wish that the FIE would go on record saying whether the handshake rule is fully back in effect. I'm actually a fan of tapping blades, because too many fencers show up to tournaments sick, and shaking hands with everyone is a good way to spread disease. Even beyond that, people often have very sweaty hands, and it's just kinda gross.

[-] xuxebiko@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm surprised she didn't declare that Kharlan's medals belong to Russia.

[-] Splitdipless@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I'm surprised Russia isn't complaining that Ukraine, which they believe should be part of Russia, isn't arguing Ukraine isn't a country and shouldn't compete.

[-] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Why should she be treated any differently than other athletes? She deliberately broke the rules, got a punishment, threw a fit overthe punishment, and now is getting a special place in the Olympics despite not qualifying for them? That seems kinda ridiculius IMO.

[-] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Being forced to shake hands with the representation of the people committing war crimes against your family and nation is an awful standard.

"Okay, we know he raped you, but it's been 17 months. Just get over it and shake his hand."

[-] Addfwyn@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That comparison makes no sense at all. Her opponent didn't assault her, nor is she responsible for the actions of any of the government involved. She's an athlete, not a head of state. She wasn't fencing against Putin.

A more apt comparison would be to refuse to shake hands with anyone from France because you were assaulted by a French person once. You would be widely, and rightfully, decried as racist for such a position.

[-] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The rules are set up to present a ladylike/gentlemanly behavior in the face of good sportsmanship. There is nothing ungentlemanly or unladylike in refusing to shake hands when a sword tap will suffice.

There is also nothing unladylike about not wanting to touch the person who represents your rapists. If the athlete representing Russia doesn't like that treatment, they can choose to participate without representing a nation.

There are simple solutions to all of these problems, but the most important aspect is she had an agreement with the official that a sword tap would be appropriate and acceptable beforehand. Downvotes mean nothing without a response. I can sign up for 10 accounts and manipulate the votes too!

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

The boyfriend of the russian fencer is currently in ukraine committing war crimes. She is a supporter of that genocide. Would you expect a jewish fencer during WW2 to shake hands with a fencer whose husband is in the SS?

[-] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

The athlete in question is not their government, cannot prevent their government from doing the war, and is not responsible for any of the crimes of her government. Changing the rules for one athlete because she doesn't like her opponent is ridiculous. This rule has been on the book for decades. People from countries in much more bitter wars have shaken hands.

And also the other fencer literally did not rape her, this situation isn't even remotely comparable to what you just said. That's an utterly ridiculous comparison. You're making it out as though this one athlete is personally responsible for everything Russia has done in the last 2 years and should be treated as such.

[-] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

That's easy to say thousands of kilometers removed from the atrocities. There's a high likelihood that someone from her family or friends was killed, raped, or deported by someone from that other athelete's friends or family. Whether or not you agree with the IOC ruling, show some fucking compassion for the athlete.

Furthermore let's not ignore the fact that the Olympics have ALWAYS been politicized, and these things fucking matter. There are entire paragraphs on Jesse Owen's wikipedia speculating on whether or not he shook Hitler's hand, because Hitler snubbed the medal presentations because he was pissed that "coloured people" were winning.
Even taking a completely cynical look at things, the optics are extremely important, and all of this, from both atheltes' behavior to the IOC's reactions, are ALL political statements to a degree or another, and everyone imvolved is a grown-ass adults who didn't have to hide behind a rulebook if they didn't want to.

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

She competes for Russia, represents Russia at this event and thus has to live with meeting the same response as her country does

[-] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That athlete represents the government in an official capacity at a world event. You're making it out like they somehow don't represent Russia.

I can see by your downvote but failure to reply that you believe the athlete does not represent Russia. Then why have country distinctions at all?

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is really insensitive and anti-feminist to make rape comparisons because you can't find less charged rhetoric to use.

[-] grue@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Considering how many Ukranian women and children are being literally raped by the Russian invaders, I'd say the comparison is plenty apt!

Your concern trolling is the thing that's insensitive and inconsiderate.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

And that has to do with this one woman competitor how? Did she sign off on the invasion?

No?

Then don't compare her being there to a rapist.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

That's a deranged analogy. Being from a nation doesn't place the crimes of the government on every citizen. More, the olymics exists to be a place to attempt to step outside conflict, as hard as that might be.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
90 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32297 readers
627 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS