2089
Agree? (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by VerbFlow@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Is this in a... um... newspaper?!

[-] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I get the sentiment, but generative AI isn't stopping anyone from making art. And you're going to have to dedicate the same amount of time to chores with or without it. :/

[-] nixfreak@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

Yes , that is what "AI" is supposed to solve for humans. Not for us to rely on it for out own creativity.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

If AI does all the art and writing and doesn't use up all the fresh water, maybe we can make some kind of trade?

[-] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

No one's stopping you from making art if you want to, and you will be better at it than an AI.

[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
2089 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

4823 readers
1525 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS