113

A couple weeks old

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

sounds like there's tons of room for improvement if some company can just show up and kill animals without any verification, which is both great news and horrifying that the people involved could be so thoughtless

[-] Fashtas@aussie.zone 10 points 1 year ago

It happens here all the time (Killing animals on unattended properties, Australia)

Sometimes the owner doesn't even LIVE on the property where the animals are, and the butcher comes down with "third gate on the right, the one with the two trees, we want the two pigs next the the barn done" written on a post-it note.

Personally we've NEVER allowed any animals killed on the property without us being there but it's not unusual.

[-] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well that insight makes me understand this more, and I can definitely understand the want and use of such instructions in these remote locations that nobody is constantly at. I suppose that just makes it more critical to double check what sparse notes you have 🥲

[-] x4740N@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Didn't peta also kidnap and put down a families dog if I recall correctly

This article reminds me of that

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A family in Washington state says a mobile butcher mistakenly slaughtered their pet pigs recently after showing up to the wrong address.

“Both Patty and Betty were laying in a big pool of blood, and a mess, and one of them had shackles on her,” the pigs’ owner, Nathan Gray, told local news station KIRO 7.

Gray and his wife, Natalie, adopted the pigs in 2022 to join their other pets, including cats, dogs, ducks and a chicken.

An attorney for the family told the BBC that the “law treats Betty and Patty no differently than if they were golden retrievers or Norwegian forest cats”, and it is a serious crime to intentionally injure an animal without legal justification.

Some butcher companies offer mobile slaughtering services for farmers who don’t want to haul their animals to a larger facility.

The Grays are advocating for more safety protocols for mobile butchers, saying that if they are bringing firearms on to someone’s property, the person should be home.


The original article contains 420 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I'm surprised that self-called 'butchers' don't get embarrassed by the negative connotations of the word, in the same way a gay person wouldn't call themselves a certain f word.

this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
113 points (100.0% liked)

Moving to piefed.lemmy.fan/c/weird_news - Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

1617 readers
52 users here now

Weird News is moving to https://piefed.lemmy.fan/c/weird_news on Friday June 27th. Please subscribe to the new community before then.

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS