To add to this, that sprawl relies on heavily subsidiaries to exist. Tax wise they collect a fraction of the taxes needed to maintain their infrastructure (depending on where suburban areas collect ½ to ⅒ of the cost needed to sustain themselves). So they are rely on subsidies from high density areas and deficit spending to exist.

As a society, spending so much to subsidize low density developments is why we have a housing crisis. It is an economically unsustainable way to build housing, and that is coming back to bite us now. We cannot afford to keep building like this.

The idea of further subsidizing people to live in already subsidized areas is terrible economic policy. It is paying someone to waste your money.

If people want to choose to live in low density areas, that is fine by me, but they need to actually pay for it themselves. We need to end the subsidies that exist now, not add new ones.

I agree. Except regarding the form of the density. I agree towers have their ppace but I prefer to see more single-stair 6-story housing across the city.

If you think it’s ever going to get cheaper you’re imagining things. They’ll build more density and it will be snapped up as prices climb higher and higher.

The only solution for cheap housing that will actually work is building that housing in cheaper parts of the country. Everyone has this dream that having a place in the lower mainland is attainable. It is not.

Expect to pay $2500 a month for 1 BR basement suite before long in the suburbs like Langley or Poco.