437
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

There’s a tendency in this heated political climate to simply reject people who are saying false things and to write off conspiracy theorists writ large.

But as the US approaches the third straight election in which misinformation — and the fight against it — is expected to play a role, it’s important to understand what’s driving people who don’t believe in US elections.

I talked to O’Sullivan about the documentary, in which he has some frank and disarming talks with people about what has shaken their belief in the US. But he paints an alarming picture about the rise of fringe movements in the country.

Our conversation, conducted by phone and edited for length, is below:

WOLF: What were you trying to accomplish with this project?

O’SULLIVAN: So much of mainstream American politics now is being infected and affected by what is happening on what was once considered the real fringes — fringe platforms, fringe personalities.

And I think really what we want to do in this show is illustrate how these personalities may be pushing falsehoods, but they’re no longer fringe. This is all happening right now. And it is having a big effect on our democracy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 87 points 1 year ago

it sucks so bad that the internet initially looked like this thing that would enlighten the world and allow for us as a species to make incredible gains in sciences and culture and morality. instead it seemed to do the opposite.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

I feel like the Internet has gone through three distinct phases. The first phase was primarily driven by individuals and a small handful of businesses. Content was highly limited, but generally positive. Lots of niche communities formed and most things had a very amateur feel to them, but everything was new and interesting.

The second phase was the rise of big corporations and the almighty ad. This was the first arms race between ad tech and ad blockers and gave us such evils as the pop up and pop under. A lot of the early charm of the internet was lost here. Everything started to become much more polished and commercialized, but we also saw a rapid expansion of content and functionality. This phase was heavily driven by corporations, and most of the early individual content was killed at this time.

The last and current phase is the social media phase. It's kind of a hybrid of the previous two. We have individuals generating most content again, but it's controlled, filtered, channeled, and exploited for commercial gain by the corporations. This has somehow lead to things being worse as corporations discovered that catering to people's worst impulses is the most profitable decision.

[-] Haus@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago

You're forgetting the pre-Web internet: 99% students & academics. It was largely awesome. When you did get trolled, it was by someone who could spell and form a cohesive argument.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Yup I was there at the edge of that (about a year before Mosaic released on a Mac).

Aol added usenet in 93 and we got on a lot of college servers, also with FTP, gopher and a little later, Hotline. So much warez and shareware games! I was in 8th grade then, had a 14.4 modem and life was pretty great.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

The current phase is equivalent to reality tv. Made with people you don’t have to pay much, if all, and run by faceless corporations.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

honestly im talking a bit further back pre www when it was basically education institutions.

[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[-] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

True story: I made a Gopher implementation that sits on top of Apache. When I first met my wife, this happened to come up in conversation, and they mentioned that being from Minnesota, they used Gopher a lot in school. I thus married the first woman who came along who knew what Gopher was.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] blargerer@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I'm not quite old enough to remember that first phase you are talking about, but I'm well old enough to remember the other two, and frankly, during them I don't think the independent niche communities really ever went anywhere. But they are really dying or dead now, and it was discord that killed them.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because the 1st wave of people on the internet were nerds and geeks. People driven by hope and optimist to make the world a better place and using the internet to do things they were already inclined to do... learn and share. You had to read, and write and things were generally long form interactions. Chat rooms required that you write sentences and paragraphs. It was also largely hosted by universities and other non-profit interests. The philosophy of Open Source and Freesoftware was rampant in the 2000s, and then declined as the big 5 took over the internet.

Now the internet is driven by corporate greed and the exploitation of the LCD's lazy monkey-brain interactions. EVerything now is a blurb, a meme, a click, a reaction emoji. A 8 min youtube video is 'too hard' now for the average internet user.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Only those seeking enlightenment or open to it will find it anywhere. The internet has done more to pierce echo chambers. Than any other invention of the last 200 years.

The problem is. It was dropped onto a largely unprepared populous. That was born into propaganda, misinformation, and confirmation bias. Without the skills to move beyond it by design. They vault over the enlightenment at their feet. Working hard digging through mountains of shit to find things to confirm their biases.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was about to say the same thing applies to AI. But AI is fucked right out of the gate. There's not even a brief window of hope for it being used to better society. Anyone with any awareness on the topic knows these AIs are already corrupted and compromised because they've been using the Internet to train all their LLMs.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Well if you go back to the use of algorithms they did have this massive potential but they all to quickly got involved with advertising and social media and yeah. it was yuck already at that point. But like computer vision and such gave it so much promise.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

algorithms could help people. they could, for example, help you find relaly cool obscure stuff on netflix/spotify that you might like. They worked like this for awhile and ti was great!

But that doesn't make money. the algorithm that shoves netflix's latest trash content does, so that is why it shows up in every suggestion an takes up so my screen space. the vast majority of my spotify 'feed' is podcast trash i have never or never ever will listen to, and i can no longer use it to find some obscure band playing weird music like I did 8 years ago.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

The internet has allowed greater collaboration, and the faster spread of information.

It has also allowed the village idiots to find each other and band together...

allowed the village idiots to find each other and band together,,,

You can exploit them more if they are a mob.

[-] dariusj18@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While true, the bigger problem is how many people would rather believe the trash because it gives them someone to be angry at instead of learning empathy for other people.

[-] dariusj18@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I was more referring to the unfortunately naive hope that came from the early Internet. I am reminded of this quote by Charles Babbage,

On two occasions I have been asked, — "Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" In one case a member of the Upper, and in the other a member of the Lower, House put this question. I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.

I was also hopeful, but I now realize how silly that was.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The internet wasn't on the 1%s leash back then. We can't be free, even digitally. To dangerous to allow such feelings in the wage slaves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago

What's really interesting is how much I agree with some people on the far right. We are angry at the conditions our society has created. We are affected by the same inequalities, lack of infrastructure, and there is no safety net in case something happens to us. It just gets insane when we see how different our solutions are.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The problem is that even though we share so many of the same problems with the far right they try to solve those problems by doubling down on them. Need food and basic housing? They make social services harder to get and cut the existing ones. Need medical care? Reject Medicaid expansion and try to get rid of the ACA. No retirement money? Go after social security and make you wait longer to get it.

Why, because someone else might get the money that didn’t “earn it” by some arbitrary metric? Or maybe they have darker skin? Or have a drug problem? Or are homeless? So the right would rather hurt themeselves so long as it hurts the people they don’t like more.

[-] PrimeMinisterKeyes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You know I've started to get the impression that the impoverished part of the right-wing electorate has long given up on looking for a solution that could really improve their lives. Instead, they want the government to create a new underclass of people made up of immigrants, leftists and criminals that they can look down on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 year ago

Because they have been taught to look in the wrong direction for the causes and solutions. Republican politicians like to cause problems and then blame others for them and use that for their campaigns. Like defunding schools and then yelling about the education system failing.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So this has been the inspiration for my reaching across the aisle approach.

You can’t convince them by calling them idiots. You need to go on their social media and instead of fighting their wrong posts, just hint and gently point them in the class conscience posts.

They are getting there, the issue now is although they do believe power hungry people want to control things. They just think it’s done via committee instead of wealth.

It takes more effort for me to convince a group of people with talking then just buying things out.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

If we had unity, we would have strength, they can't have that. The politicians are hell-bent on pushing us apart even though we all likely agree on many things.

[-] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Read the Naomi Klein book Doppelganger

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Join our campaign to free this pitiful creature! Details inside.

I used to get so high and read this ish. Good times!

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

What you may not know is that this paper, along with the National Enquirer, were the result of the efforts of Gene Pope.

A guy whose job immediately before buying up and transforming the Enquirer was in the CIA's psychological warfare division.

This was around the time the CIA was upset with national coverage of UFOs. Suddenly stories about them were appearing alongside "Elvis lives" or Bat Boy, and no reputable news would touch UFO stories with a 10' pole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

When people talk about the "fringe", don't forget how far we have drifted.

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

If the internet has done anything, it's a) been a boon for people studying tribal psychology, and b) put a fork in the information deficit model.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

The internet has shown us that conservatives like to be lied to. But that tendency itself predates the internet. Before conservatives said Obama was a Muslim they said that Eisenhower was a secret Communist. Before conservatives said horse medicine cures covid they said Laetrile cures cancer.

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not a bad article, but I wish they wouldn't use politically neutral language like fringe or polarisation or even just conspiracy theorist, as if the issues aren't almost exclusively happening on one side of politics. Call a spade a spade already.

[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If you are concerned with the quality of candidates of Republicans, consider working towards passing electoral reform in your state. Maybe these conservatives aren't happy with the republicans or democrats and would like to vote for some other conservative political party.

Getting rid of First Past The Post voting would allow these people to choose a more moderate conservative, while still counting their vote if their preference didn't win.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Some?

I'd argue it's most. Granted, people's level of delusion varies, but esp among the younger kids who are tik-tok addicts, there is a marked decline in their ability to realize there is a world outside of their experience and what they are being told on tik-tok.

What baffles me is the intolerance of disagreement. When I was in college the main thing I learned was the limits of what I know, how much I don't know, and to tolerate others POV and to investigate the facts and see beyond biased narratives and recognize those biases...

Today it seems all people learn is 'i am right, because i feel i am right, and nobody can tell me otherwise'. and people are more and more extreme in their views and more willing to dehumanize others for the smallest of disagreements. IRL and on the internet.

My views are liberal, but I'm open to conservative ideas. This was not controversial in the 2000s, and most of the early 2010s, but post Trump/tiktok, even my own former friends on the left have whole-heartedly adopted the 'I am a victim and my feelings are all that matters' mentality, and just live in these social media hug boxes where every little think they do is a HUGE achievement, and any mistake they make is never their fault. Meanwhile, they bitch and bitch about how unfair and unhappy their lives are if only rich white guys would just give them their money it would all be better. They have zero interest in building anything inclusive or meaningful in their communities, unless you define community as 'only people who look, speak, and think exactly like I do'. Everything is a catchphrase, and no subtling is allowed. 'ACAB'... well I have family who are cops.... sorry if I'm not on board with the mentality that ACAB, but I 100% recognize the need for police reform... but that viewpoint is 'toxic' now. You can't recognize cops as people.

It's truly dark. I've also seen it firsthand with people i've know for several years now, watching them slowly become angry nutbags whose joy in life is enforcing social confomrity into whatever fiefdom they are a part of. And I am just sort of peacing out now, because I no longer want to be involved in communities and groups full of narcissistic twits and angry miserable people whose only joy in life is shitting on others who are different than them.

[-] SupahRevs@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Somebody that fits this description (excluding ACAB) won the Presidency. Self promoting and selfish desires. The "greed is good" era has continued pushing a selfish culture over community driven goals. This is especially true in the large media organizations and social media. Media makes decisions for profits and selfish goals over community engagement, education, and cohesiveness.

But, there are many counter examples in the actual community. The community driven people just make less noise online. I volunteer with college kids and the generosity and desire for community building is really impressive. I would not find this online but in real life it is very evident. But no one makes money selling things to people who care about others more than themselves. So advertising and social media cater to the selfish side of people so that is what we see more often.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Sadly any community org that started out great I have been a part of always lets money get in the way... and then it all becomes about 'image' and social conformity and such.

I recently left a community garden group I helped build because they won some grant and decided they needed to get more grants and more money and the best way to do that was to become a group that 'helps marginalized peoples' and hence... if you are white you should leave because you aren't helping our 'brand'. They changed all the photos on the social media/website to women and minorities, despite the fact 70% of the people doing the actual work were white male folks... but since that doesn't fit the 'brand' they need to get more money... it's just a self-defeating process and what was a inclusive group is now exclusive. Despite the flat irony that the racial makeup of our group was spot on with the that of the city (70% white) it's not decided that no, your skin color is what matters.

Greed ruins everything.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Helping marginalized peoples? Dear god, what horrors will they think of next?

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 11 points 1 year ago

It's ACAB not ACAP (all cops are pigs). ACAB doesn't dehumanize police, it is a statement that says the institution itself is rotten and makes bastards out of well intending people. Some people do dehumanize police, and often when they do, they point to the inhumane acts of the police force at large.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

right, calling people pigs and bastards isn't dehumanizing... lol

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

They said the acronym isn't pigs so ACAB doesn't dehumanize, a bastard is a type of human

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Just got to love how you get downvoted. Essentially exactly doing what you complain about.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

The interview is with a person that made a documentary called MisinfoNation: The Trump Faithful. It said it was airing on CNN tonight, but I don't have cable. It doesn't look like it's available anywhere online. Dammit.

[-] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

Misinformation has been around before the written word and while many are pointing the finger at the Internet for making it worse, I am not convinced it has. I mean all bought trickle down economics before the Internet for example.

[-] minnow@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Trickle down economics, as a theory, has been around well over 100 years, and it's never been believed in by everybody. Hell, a presidential candidate gave a speech against the idea in 1896

You're correct about misinformation having been around forever, but access to and ease to create misinformation is greater than ever before thanks to the Internet.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Of course the Internet has made it worse. It did so initially by giving a platform to hucksters, fascists and frauds that let them find like minded people that otherwise would not have convalesced around them.

Social media optimized this process, and now algorithms design entire custom made echo chambers that reinforce and amplify the outrageous because it profitable to do so, as rage and violence keep people on the platform, churning though ads.

Youre right that capitalism, the unending profit motive that must increase is the true source of the damage, but the internet has been a powerful engine in its conquest of truth for profit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

You have forgotten the feedback and psychological magnification of technology. Written word was just put out there. Focus groups became more prominent with TV ads. The internet provided a whole new set of tools like algorithms and data analysis to study and more effectively sway people's thinking. Putin has developed a whole new type of hybrid warfare using cyber technology.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
437 points (100.0% liked)

News

30689 readers
3849 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS