371
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 109 points 7 months ago

Crazy that the proposed solution to propaganda is banning media instead of investing in education that promotes critical thinking. Or maybe the idea here is "no propaganda except mine".

[-] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 49 points 7 months ago

Investing in education is counter to the clear goals of the USA. Smart people would revolt, protest,and you know, hold companies and billionaires accountable. Uneducated people are often poor, can’t afford to fight back and are scared they will lose what little they have.

At some point we need all to fight back, but it might be too late. And worse, too few will join in out of fear of death.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

If people can pick apart China's propaganda it means they can pick apart US propaganda, too.

Can't have that.

[-] SolNine@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 months ago

I have to tell you, I know many intelligent people that have succumbed to propaganda, and outrage porn addiction. I see it continue to happen on all sides of the political isle. (This isn't a both sides kind of statement, simply acknowledgement that the same tactics work on our brain, indifferent of political ideology.)

Whether they are hooked on the dopamine rush of rage baiting up votes, likes or comments; or only seeing everything in the world through a myopic lens of negativity, it has captured many of my friends and family, including myself for a time.

For some their drug is Fox News, others it's Reddit, Facebook or TikTok, the results are often the same.

I have yet to figure out a manner in which to communicate with individuals who spend considerable amounts of time in echo chambers, constantly having their personal beliefs reinforced. Evasion of cognitive dissonance and social conflict are very powerful psychological motivations. I wish I knew the solution.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

And yet China is banning basically the whole Western internet, foreign companies must enter joint ventures with Chinese companies under government control. Reciprocity is fair. Why should Byte Dance be allowed to take in billions to fund Chinese gulags?

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

China does thing: Bad

America does same thing: Good

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OftenWrong@startrek.website 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Why do you want our social media to mirror China? That's the real question. What's the US gonna do with our data that's so much better? Oh yeah, fund our allies genocides! Yay! 🥳

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Well, of course. They aren't banning Facebook, Instagram or YouTube. That's exactly how they want it.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

they aren't even banning tiktok, at least they're trying not to. What they're trying to do is force a sale specifically to US government insiders. They're seizing it. They want that sweet, sweet propaganda and data mining for themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago

What do you think billionaires are bribing congress for? Regulatory capture keeps all the competitors out. Whereas actually fixing the problem of social media brainwashing would cost them money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zap@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 7 months ago

Minimum wage has been $7.25/hr for 15 years and this is what they're getting done on Capitol Hill 🤪

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

How about a digital bill of rights that applies to every corporation you fucking cowards!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago

I see no issue with banning tik tok.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 23 points 7 months ago

I don't like TikTok, but I do take issue with the government deciding what is and isn't available to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ours@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Except they would be ignoring all the other shitty social networks but it's a start.

[-] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's not a start tho, it's killing competition of Facebook and Google. It's consolidating power if anything. I believe this bill has nothing to do with security issues and everything to do with campaign contributions to make sure America never has to compete with another country in this space.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago

what did tiktok do to deserve being banned, and why is it okay for other companies to do that?

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Feeding data to the CCP, helping them identify people who can be easily swayed into espionage. Say someone gets into a position of power. "Hey, remember when you were 12 and said this on tik Tok? Now we need you to be out bitch or we're leaking this."

Look at the things that have gone viral on Tik Tok, it's like their algorithm prioritizes things that are toxic to make American youth shittier. Kia boys comes to mind.

There is also the fact that China bans all American social media out of fear that we'd use it to manipulate their people. If they aren't allowing our businesses to compete fairly, why should we allow theirs? Also, they probably are projecting that fear because they are doing exactly that with TikTok.

The app has more permissions than most apps and is highly invasive. They sent a push notification to all their users based on Geo location saying who their rep was and giving their phone number saying to call them to stop this bill. That alone seems like a major abuse of power. They are using the data they have to try to sway the American politicians already.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago

you've failed to answer my second question, which I believe was the important one: why should this behavior be perfectly legal for everyone other than tiktok?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

TikTok is very heavily influenced by the CCP and could be used to collect data from Americans (probably they already are). Not wanting your biggest geopolitical rival to harvest data from your citizens is pretty understandable.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] OftenWrong@startrek.website 7 points 7 months ago

Except for the part where they couldn't get support for it twice so they shoved it in here to get their way? But that's ok because you don't like the silly dancing app that you know basically nothing about right? Other than "China bad", of course.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Well the Senate killed the earlier bill. There's a decent chance they pass the Ukraine/Israel aid bill without this amendment. It would then be stricken in reconciliation. Unfortunately there's also a decent chance the Senate passes it because this version probably fixes things the Senators had problems with.

If it does get passed there's a very good chance there's a court order to prevent anything until the courts rule on the constitutionality of the law. If Bytedance loses that there's zero chance they sell though. The US market is not big enough for them to jettison an international company.

[-] MisterMoo@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago

Why are you cheerleading for TikTok to remain in the hands of a US adversary, during the same week when said adversary forced a US company to abjectly ban US-based messaging apps?

Retaliation. Tit for tit.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

If the government can just point at a company and force a fire sale then there is no market, there is no order, there is no financial industry. This is an incredibly dangerous law.

[-] jumjummy@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

The alternative is to outright ban it. Tik Tok is a cancer directly controlled by a hostile nation state. The government absolutely has the right to block foreign interference like this.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Pray tell how is this any worse than Facebook? Is the CCP in the Los Angeles TikTok office moderating content?

Or is this just more bullshit invented on the spot to justify an unconstitutional power grab?

load more comments (32 replies)
[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 months ago

The government absolutely has unconditional and unlimited authority to restrict enemy states from ownership of anything in the US they want to.

There is absolutely no possibility of any Constitutional issue. The government has explicit authority to handle anything they want about international commerce in the Constitution.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

That's why they're having to pass this law I guess then? Because they already have the authority to do the thing they're trying to make the law to get the authority to do?

And TikTok isn't owned by China. It's owned by ByteDance, a MultiNational Corp with Chinese ties. It's not operated out of China, Tiktok is operated out of Singapore and Los Angeles.

And what exactly is the security concern of people making funny cat videos? Nobody is saying the government has to put Tiktok on government computers. So what exactly is the exposure here that trumps the first amendment and prohibition on bills of attainder in the US?

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

To your first point, yes, exactly. Congress mostly has to pass bills to exercise their power. For example: they have the authority to decide finances. They pass bills to (barely) get that done.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] esc27@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

It was right there!

[-] tedu@azorius.net 18 points 7 months ago

The first amendment doesn't have an exception for retaliation.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] pop@lemmy.ml 19 points 7 months ago
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

mimes eating popcorn, while pointing to overlayed captions, with a Taylor Swift song playing in the background

[-] scrappydoo@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] skymtf@pricefield.org 15 points 7 months ago

It's not even about propaganda it's not having it until their thumb, they can't push a button and ensure the top video under trans on every search is Matt Walsh, and yeah on all other major platforms if you search trans people critical of trans people pop up. The reasoning isn't popularity or engagement, the US government has ordered them to do it through backroom tax deals and Slapp orders. Next stop for the US gov is gonna be the fediverse and AT proto, they are gonna argue that not just anyone should be trusted and that running a social media server is a big task. security blah blah children, protecting your data. Than lass a bill require you to obtain an FCC license to host your own social media site. It only gets worse from here folks

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] x0x7@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Weren't you all just hating on Republicans for not voting for that bill.

How about an all bills must be fucking separate bill?

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

This was a separate bill. Til Tok, Taiwan, Ukraine, and Israel were all separate. They were brought to the floor at the same time, but they could’ve all been voted on differently

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

You need to fix voting in congress first. The reason riders get put in is because some small bills that are of no interest to some in congress would never make it because they’d never get enough votes to pass. Of course the system got abused to hell with poison pills and shitty bills that are crammed into popular legislation to make it hard to pass or make good legislation pass shitty laws.

So yeah, split the bills. But make these clowns vote on everything.

[-] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Oh, no! What will I do without my level 5 gyatt rizz livvy fanum tax dunne rizzing up baby gronk ice spice wat da dawg doin skibidi toilet in real life only in ohio we go jim zyzz creatine alpha sigma cuh dey board?

This bill would also outlaw using VPNs to view such restricted platforms, and has a general policy that would allow lawmakers to ban any platform they claim is a national security risk. No overreach here!

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The poor kids will lose everything because of course you can only host that kind of fucking trash on tik tok!! It's either on tik tok or not at all!!!

it's ridiculous how attached these children are to a chinese company lol. They just host the goddamn footage and provide an algo to feed that shit to you. THAT'S IT! TT ain't some special fuckin unicorn

but the kids are kids and they don't want to think about and understand that. Most on tiktok probably don't even know of or remember Vine or the other previous iterations of the same exact shit concept. But noooo, the CCP must be allowed to frame the narratives/algos and vacuum up all possible PII data!!!

now that aside, the VPN part you mention is indeed disturbing. Could you please provide the source / exact wording for this claim? I want to read more about it but can't find anything close to what you are suggesting

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/8038/text?s=3&r=1#toc-H2669E9E74E8A43039D7E92B5E8152F38

VPN or virtual private network are not mentioned anywhere

[-] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 months ago

TikTok is also a pretty effective protest tool, which is also a threat to conservatives. It's just funny how they're so against the CCP rotting the brains of children but do nothing about the black box of YouTube recommendations and every American social media platform (until they started banning campaign misinformation)

VPn or virtual private network are not mentioned anywhere

Shit, they revised it then. I remember there was originally language like that in the original 2023 version.

Currently 0-2 today for spreading correct information.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Can we just put the american and chinese government in a room and let them fight it out untill they are done?

Just let me watch my funny cat videos and cooking videos in peace thankyou very much.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
371 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59612 readers
3189 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS