2112

I assume "Other purposes" is govt kickbacks to mining and gas companies 😬

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BlazeMaster3000@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

You can request this in most countries, especially here in Canada. It's cool that the Aussie government makes it more transparent and accessible though. The "other purposes" seems a bit sussy-baka, though.

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is no excuse for any country not to do this TBH. The math is really easy and uses already available information: take the year's total federal spending for different things, specifically in the form of percentages of the year's total tax revenue (hopefully the government has been keeping track of what they've been using the money for) and multiply by the total taxes paid by a specific person and you get exactly how much of their money went to what. This assumes every person's tax revenue is treated the same which I'm pretty sure is at least mostly the case in every country.

If they release the national spending percentages (which they should) then it'd be pretty easy for individuals to calculate these themselves.

[-] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Well there is a reason: they spend it on bullshit and they don't want tax payers to know

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Centaur@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

In my country government spending is mystery for tax payers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wolre@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I think this is a pretty good idea, actually. While this kind of information is available in most western places, people usually can't be bothered to look it up and then have very weird ideas about what their taxes are probably spent on. This would at least help clear some things up.

[-] Hogger85b@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tories in the UK did this and obfuscated to their agenda

They showed "pensions" but that was only public sector worker pensions then added the universal state pension to the "benefits" section to claim we had a bloated benefits budget for scroungers despite them being the party of triple lock pension (linked to greater of wages, inflation and aribitary 2%)

[-] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Mannnn... I wish we had this in the U.S. Unfortunately it would ruin a lot of the propaganda forced down our throats, disabling some talking points for our dumbass politicians.

They'd never give us something so comprehensive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Peepolo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

We get this in the UK too 👍.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Orange@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

That is a freaking sweet seal for the Australian Government! Id wear that on a shirt

[-] Jolan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm surprised so much money is going towards disability, what kind of stuff do they get?

[-] hanni@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago

Helpers, workers, special housing, apecial Beds and equipment. Some have 24/7 care.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] instamat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Is this hard to do in practice? I would love to see a breakdown like this in the United States, and especially on a local level. What’s involved in getting this information? Where does someone even start to request something like this?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
2112 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17629 readers
104 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS