149
submitted 2 years ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip

An Australian museum excluded men from an exhibit to highlight misogyny. A man sued for access and won.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/mkwF8

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] doctortofu@reddthat.com 58 points 2 years ago

Protesting misogyny through misandry - what a fabulous idea! Next, how about a protest against childhood obesity by starving a couple of kids to death?

Doing a shitty thing to protest a different shitty thing only multiplies the amount of shit instead of reducing it...

[-] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

While I agree with you in principle, the guy that took this to the courts is a giant dickhead.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 2 years ago

As seen by the other guy, who upon talking to artist about his similar suit said "oh, I get it now"

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago
[-] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Because thinking he's the victim of an injustice by being denied entry in an exhibit about sexism shows a total lack of empathy for people less privileged than him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 54 points 2 years ago

I'm not really a fan of the whole "we'll be intolerant so you know what it feels like" but it's also the only way I can really know what it feels like as a white man from a middle class family. I'm on the fence on this one.

[-] pleasejustdie@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago

They should just make it a small art exhibit out front, then 2 bathrooms, the mens is normal, with some basic art, but the women's bathroom has a bar and cocktail lounge and the extra amenities. Then the business wouldn't be excluding men, it would just be providing them a different experience in the bathroom which I feel like they'd have a much better time defending in court. But it also seems like this whole thing was done as a form of activism and it looks like one of the intents is for this business to close down so they can be martyrs.

[-] Jaytreeman@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 years ago

You don't need to know what it feels like. Trying to fight intolerance with intolerance isn't successful.

[-] rutellthesinful@kbin.social 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You don’t need to know what it feels like.

no, but it can help

Trying to fight intolerance with intolerance isn’t successful.

blanket statements like this are rarely helpful or true

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

I think downvoters have forgotten the paradox of tolerance. That said, intolerance should be applied at the individual level (ie don't tolerate a nazi because they are a nazi), not by group (like the scenario this thread is about did).

[-] OftenWrong@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago

So a group of nazis is cool with you I guess?

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

More like if there's a bunch of nazis in an area, don't assume any white person is a member and request carpet bombings of neighborhoods.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

If any approach had been genuinely successful, this conversation wouldn't even be happening.

[-] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 27 points 2 years ago

That's easy.
For starters: Go to China. Go to the middle east. Go to Zimbabwe. Go to the wrong parts of Brazil or South Africa.

Hell, go to Northern Ireland.

It's an idiotic thing to state that white people are not and have never been oppressed.

[-] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

Go to the wrong parts of Brazil or South Africa.

What do you you mean "wrong parts"? 🤨

It's an idiotic thing to state that white people are not and have never been oppressed.

White (an invented and morphose social category predicated on anti-Blackness) people have never been oppressed for being white.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

White (an invented and morphose social category predicated on anti-Blackness) people have never been oppressed for being white.

Imagine actually believing this.

[-] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

Imagine actually believing this.

I don't have to; I know from personal experience what it's like to be right and correct. I recommend you abandon you current beliefs and try not being wrong yourself.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't have to; I know from personal experience what it's like to be right and correct. I recommend you abandon you current beliefs and try not being wrong yourself.

Maybe one day you'll wake up and realize that you don't know everything and are not always "right and correct." One day maybe you'll realize that others have lived experiences that are different than yours, but maybe not and you'll just float through life thinking your experience and your views are The Truth.

[-] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Maybe one day you'll wake up and realize that you don't know everything and are not always "right and correct."

Possible, but irrelevant to this situation wherein I am right, cool, and correct.

[-] EldritchFeminity 6 points 2 years ago

The concept of "white" as a race dates back to WW2, at most. Before then, being from France was as ethnically important a distinction as being from England, Spain, Germany, Ireland, or China. Due to the long history of conflict amongst European nations, there was no unified sense of race due to something as simple as skin color.

When the Irish immigrated to the US, they were considered equivalent to black people by Americans and competed for the same jobs.

The British, inspired by the American ethnic cleansings of the Native American tribes, attempted to ethnically cleanse the Irish from Ireland for their land. That's what the famine in Ireland actually was. There was a scarcity of potatoes, but otherwise there was plenty of food - so long as you were British. In fact, there's a statue of a Native American in northern Ireland commemorating the Native tribes' aid during the famine, because they recognized what the British were doing and were one of the few groups to send supplies to the Irish. Nobody else cared, because they were Irish, not (insert country here).

[-] norbert@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

The concept of “white” as a race dates back to WW2, at most.

Wow I'll make sure to tell all my black friends, I'm sure that'll endear me to them.

When the Irish immigrated to the US, they were considered equivalent to black people by Americans and competed for the same jobs.

Well, this is just completely false, you're completely disconnected from reality. Irish were never blocked from whites-only schools were they? Irish people were never subject to interracial marriage laws afaik. Were any Irish ever entirely excluded from being able to immigrate to the U.S.? I know it's popular among certain groups to pretend certain Europeans faced the same disadvantages as formerly enslaved African-Americans but frankly it's incredibly insulting and tone deaf as fuck.

Theory is fine you guys but you need to actually go out into the world and interact with people sometimes.

[-] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

my black friends

I was wondering when—not if—you were going to pull "I have Black friends".

[-] norbert@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Cool thought-terminating cliche too bad you didn't actually address anything I said.

[-] EldritchFeminity 4 points 2 years ago

I am...unclear on what you're actually arguing about. You went from arguing that white people are oppressed for being white and/or that white as a unified race wasn't the invention of racism to separate the white European ethnicities from black people, to straw-manning me to argue that white people were never oppressed the same way black people have been (and continue to be).

Both me and the OP are saying that the idea of a single "white" race was the invention of racists. To separate white Europeans from other people. Before the white supremacists coined the term white as a race, your race was French, Swedish, Irish, British, Russian, etc. White is just a label to lump all these Europeans from disparate cultural backgrounds who hated each other's guts together to form a unified front against "the savage black man" and "the Asian menace."

And nobody has ever been oppressed for being white. When was the last time you heard of somebody being passed over for a job because they were too white, or the cops going around arresting all the white people off the streets. White people probably suffer the same treatment as other foreigners in xenophobic countries, but they're not singled out for being white.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

I'm not arguing anything, just pointing out some bullshit.

[-] EldritchFeminity 5 points 2 years ago

What bullshit? Do you think that white people are oppressed? Or that the idea of white as a race wasn't the product of a bunch of racists who wanted to prove the superiority of white people over black people?

[-] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

The concept of “white” as a race dates back to WW2, at most.

It goes back farther than that, but it is a social and legal category people have sued in attempt to be considered as.

[-] EldritchFeminity 3 points 2 years ago

Appreciate the correction, the first time I could think of as "white" being a unified thing was the white supremacists of the "Aryan master race" era.

[-] rutellthesinful@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago
[-] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

Barbary slave trade?

Read through that entire article and didn't read one word about anyone being oppressed for being white.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] capital@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Plenty of down-votes but strangely no responses.

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

I mean, overwhelmingly people aren't racially discriminated against for being white so I'm not sure what it is you're trying to back up.

Sure it happens. The one that's closest to home for me in that list is Northern Ireland. White Catholics here were abused, but it was by white people so nothing to do with the colour of their skin. Honestly such a terrible example with absolutely no understanding for historical context.

I've spent non-trivial time in the Middle East. Sure I'm not at the same social class as Arabs there but I was sure fucking glad I wasn't brown.

China, wot? Yeah people stare at me but nobody was nasty. If anything I was a novelty.

White people in South Africa were gonna get what they were gonna get in a post apartheid world where they pillaged and oppressed until quite recently. That doesn't make it right but it makes it inevitable.

They're all very poorly thought out, edge case examples with the exception of Zimbabwe unless I'm missing others that I'm not aware of.

[-] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The Irish have been abused and degrqded by the British for Centuries. Still are, not nearly like they used to be, but its still there.

China. You know they officially call white people a racist slur right?

Middle East: Not as bad as Middle eastern women or anyone from southeast Asia. Still racist.

South Africa: yup, cant say they didnt deserve it, but its still racism, also not inevitable.

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The Irish have been abused and degrqded by the British for Centuries. Still are, not nearly like they used to be, but its still there.

I know very well. I'm Irish. Pretty sure still have our own "and the Irish" section in British airports as a holdover from the troubles. The point I'm making is that it had nothing to do with being white and I haven't met any British people trying to abuse or degrade me for being Irish. My sister lives there and is married to an English man so I visit frequently.

China: I didn't experience any overt racism there because of the colour of my skin. We have derogatory words for basically everyone in English but it doesn't mean people use them. Hell, we call the British "Tans" if we're feeling belligerent towards them. "Paddy" has lost all meaning as a slur against the Irish.

Middle east: Sure. There I did experience it but it was incredibly mild and as I said I was very glad I wasn't brown.

Anyway, my main point was this:

overwhelmingly people aren’t racially discriminated against for being white

And I feel that it stands and yes there are exceptions but the historical weight of racism hasn't fallen on white people because of the colour of their skin.

[-] psivchaz@reddthat.com 23 points 2 years ago

The more interesting thing to me is... They were modeling a thing that was popular in the 60s, according to the article. It's an art display to protest something from 60+ years ago. A lot of the people who would go to such an exhibit weren't alive, and certainly weren't adults at the time.

There are surely problems that women face today but I don't see how this helps shine any light on that or does anything at all for it.

[-] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 years ago

Idk how I feel about this. I will say however, any time I've ever seen feminist principles be applied exclusionary, it's always additionally accompanied by TERF shit. It's a very quick pipeline from "no boys allowed" to "no trans allowed". The lines dividing can be so blurry... I don't think it's a good mindset.

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'll bring this up only once, because not only do I not want to deal with backlash, I also dont want to stand in the way of progress or hurt anyone who is trans, but: Notice how society mostly freaks out about Trans Women, and Trans Men are an afterthought in that outrage. Its because Misandry is playing a not insignificant part in this. A key thing about transphobes is they arent seeing Trans Women as Women, and its their ideas on how MEN are that are informing their vitrol. So you are seeing those two go hand in hand for a reason

Edit: Fuck it, I need to clarify: Trans Women are WOMEN, Trans Men are MEN

[-] EldritchFeminity 13 points 2 years ago

Yup, trans men are "poor deluded women and victims of the patriarchy" and trans women are "predators trying to invade women's spaces". And that's if trans men are even thought of at all.

[-] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah that was the allusion I was leaning towards

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 5 points 2 years ago

From their website:

The lounge is a tremendously lavish space in our museum in which women can indulge in decadent nibbles, fancy tipples, and other ladylike pleasures—hosted and entertained by the fabulous butler. And as is always the case with Kirsha’s dinners and feasts, you are a participant in what she sees as the art itself, part of a living installation. Any and all ladies are welcome.

Any and all ladies doesn't sound like they are excluding people that may not have been born female. It sounds, at least to me, that it includes said person group.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

Sometimes I believe women’s only spaces need to exist for some instances of women who experienced trauma to feel safe and be able to start their healing without their nervous systems taking over.

However, this doesn’t sound like that. This sounds like exclusion.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

Under liberalism, the goal of the oppressed is to become the oppressor.

[-] RustyShackleford@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

That's not exclusive to "liberalism".

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Right, it also includes nazism, liberalism's ugly adult form and conservatism, liberalism's rude sibling.

[-] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm gonna start a "Dogs Only" exhibit and it's just a bunch of delicious hotdogs hanging from easily-accessible strings and shit.

Don't worry, I've got one for cats too. Same thing.

[-] dellish@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Perhaps women should take on The Melbourne Club next and see how quickly men change their mind on the subject?

I understand the guy's argument in this case seems to be the fact he bought a ticket at the same price as a woman but was excluded from one of the exhibits, but the overarching point of sexual discrimination works both ways.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
149 points (100.0% liked)

Global News

5100 readers
216 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS