882

A shocking story was promoted on the "front page" or main feed of Elon Musk's X on Thursday:

"Iran Strikes Tel Aviv with Heavy Missiles," read the headline.

This would certainly be a worrying world news development. Earlier that week, Israel had conducted an airstrike on Iran's embassy in Syria, killing two generals as well as other officers. Retaliation from Iran seemed like a plausible occurrence.

But, there was one major problem: Iran did not attack Israel. The headline was fake.

Even more concerning, the fake headline was apparently generated by X's own official AI chatbot, Grok, and then promoted by X's trending news product, Explore, on the very first day of an updated version of the feature.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] style99@kbin.social 177 points 5 months ago

People who deploy AI should be held responsible for the slander and defamation the AI causes.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 100 points 5 months ago

Slander is spoken. In print, it's libel.

[-] pwr22@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 5 months ago

Get me pictures of Spiderman!

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 14 points 5 months ago

Parker, why does Spider-Man have seven fingers in this photo?!

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago

Why I imagine Xitter lawyers arguing that was it was neither spoken nor "printed", they can't be charged?

[-] anon987@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

You expect people pushing AI fear mongering to be literate?

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

how is it fear mongering when shit like this is happening? AI as it stands is unregulated and will continue to cause issues if left this way

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago

So will self-driving cars, the oil industry, and a bunch of others. The US is a plutocracy, and Musk has enough power to keep playing around with this, so that's it. If you want actual change, either start organizing for a general strike or a civil war, since stopping Musk is not on the ballot, and most likely won't be for either of your lifetimes.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

I mean, if your problem is just narrowly musk, the one guy, you don't need a whole war; just one shot.

I'm not advocating this, just pointing out, you know? Not that I have a problem with turning the class massacre into a class war.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kadu@lemmy.world 151 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I wonder how legislation is going to evolve to handle AI. Brazilian law would punish a newspaper or social media platform claiming that Iran just attacked Israel - this is dangerous information that could affect somebody's life.

If it were up to me, if your AI hallucinated some dangerous information and provided it to users, you're personally responsible. I bet if such a law existed in less than a month all those AI developers would very quickly abandon the "oh no you see it's impossible to completely avoid hallucinations for you see the math is just too complex tee hee" and would actually fix this.

[-] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 97 points 5 months ago

I bet if such a law existed in less than a month all those AI developers would very quickly abandon the "oh no you see it's impossible to completely avoid hallucinations for you see the math is just too complex tee hee" and would actually fix this.

Nah, this problem is actually too hard to solve with LLMs. They don't have any structure or understanding of what they're saying so there's no way to write better guardrails.... Unless you build some other system that tries to make sense of what the LLM says, but that approaches the difficulty of just building an intelligent agent in the first place.

So no, if this law came into effect, people would just stop using AI. It's too cavalier. And imo, they probably should stop for cases like this unless it has direct human oversight of everything coming out of it. Which also, probably just wouldn't happen.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 5 months ago

Yep. To add on, this is exactly what all the "AI haters" (myself included) are going on about when they say stuff like there isn't any logic or understanding behind LLMs, or when they say they are stochastic parrots.

LLMs are incredibly good at generating text that works grammatically and reads like it was put together by someone knowledgable and confident, but they have no concept of "truth" or reality. They just have a ton of absurdly complicated technical data about how words/phrases/sentences are related to each other on a structural basis. It's all just really complicated math about how text is put together. It's absolutely amazing, but it is also literally and technologically impossible for that to spontaneously coelesce into reason/logic/sentience.

Turns out that if you get enough of that data together, it makes a very convincing appearance of logic and reason. But it's only an appearance.

You can't duct tape enough speak and spells together to rival the mass of the Sun and have it somehow just become something that outputs a believable human voice.


For an incredibly long time, ChatGPT would fail questions along the lines of "What's heavier, a pound of feathers or three pounds of steel?" because it had seen the normal variation of the riddle with equal weights so many times. It has no concept of one being smaller than three. It just "knows" the pattern of the "correct" response.

It no longer fails that "trick", but there's significant evidence that OpenAI has set up custom handling for that riddle over top of the actual LLM, as it doesn't take much work to find similar ways to trip it up by using slightly modified versions of classic riddles.

A lot of supporters will counter "Well I just ask it to tell the truth, or tell it that it's wrong, and it corrects itself", but I've seen plenty of anecdotes in the opposite direction, with ChatGPT insisting that it's hallucination was fact. It doesn't have any concept of true or false.

[-] neatchee@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The shame of it is that despite this limitation LLMs have very real practical uses that, much like cryptocurrencies and NFTs did to blockchain, are being undercut by hucksters.

Tesla has done the same thing with autonomous driving too. They claimed to be something they're not (fanboys don't @ me about semantics) and made the REAL thing less trusted and take even longer to come to market.

Drives me crazy.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Yup, and I hate that.

I really would like to one day just take road trips everywhere without having to actually drive.

[-] neatchee@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Right? Waymo is already several times safer than humans and tesla's garbage, yet municipalities keep refusing them. Trust is a huge problem for them.

And yes, haters, I know that they still have problems in inclement weather but that's kinda the point: we would be much further along if it weren't for the unreasonable hurdles they keep facing because of fear created by Tesla

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Hadn't heard of this. Thanks!

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

For road trips (i.e. interstates and divided highways), GM’s Super Cruise is pretty much there unless you go through a construction zone. I just went from Atlanta to Knoxville without touching the steering wheel once.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cygon@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I love that example. Microsoft's Copilot (based on GTP-4) immediately doesn't disappoint:

Microsoft Copilot: Two pounds of feathers and a pound of lead both weigh the same: two pounds. The difference lies in the material—feathers are much lighter and less dense than lead. However, when it comes to weight, they balance out equally.

It's annoying that for many things, like basic programming tasks, it manages to generate reasonable output that is good enough to goat people into trusting it, yet hallucinates very obviously wrong stuff or follows completely insane approaches on anything off the beaten path. Every other day, I have to spend an hour to justify to a coworker why I wrote code this way when the AI has given him another "great" suggestion, like opening a hidden window with an UI control to query a database instead of going through our ORM.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kadu@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

So no, if this law came into effect, people would just stop using AI. And imo, they probably should stop for cases like this unless it has direct human oversight of everything coming out of it.

Then you and I agree. If AI can be advertised as a source of information but at the same time can't provide safeguarded information, then there should not be commercial AI. Build tools to help video editing, remove backgrounds from photos, go nuts, but do not position yourself as a source of information.

Though if fixing AI is at all possible, even if we predict it will only happen after decades of technology improvements, it for sure won't happen if we are complacent and do not add such legislative restrictions.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Another of Musk cutting corners to the max and endangering lives but why should he care? He is in control and that is the only thing that matters to him, even if he loses billions of dollars.

[-] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 89 points 5 months ago

To everyone that goes to "X" to get the "real", unfiltered news, I hope you can see that it's not that site anymore.

[-] SeedyOne@lemm.ee 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yet, annoyingly, much of the press still uses it to disseminate news.

I understand journalism is in a rough spot these days and many are there against their will but something needs to change abruptly. This slow exodus is too slow for democracy to survive '24.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

I'd argue it never was anything outside of pulling net celebs names from hats and claiming they were rapists and racists without evidence, and then having them get chased off the internet, destroying their careers in the process and in some cases causing suicides... Unless they actually did it, because then they were rich and could just buy good publicity or start an Alt-Right circle jerk where they can claim "Wokeness" did it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] darkmogool@feddit.de 72 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"Grok" sounds like a name of a really stupid ork from a D&D capaign.

[-] expr@programming.dev 56 points 5 months ago

In case you're not familiar, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grok.

It's somewhat common slang in hacker culture, which of course Elon is shitting all over as usual. It's especially ironic since the meaning of the word roughly means "deep or profound understanding", which their AI has anything but.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 months ago

Pretty sure its something from a Heilein book namely stranger from a strange world.

[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 16 points 5 months ago

Gork is from Stranger in a Strange Land.

[-] umbraroze@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Yup. Got also added to the Jargon File, which was an influential collection of hacker slang.

If there's one thing that Elon is really good at, it's taking obscure beloved nerd tidbits and then pigeon-shitting all over them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rubanski@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

Grok smash!

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 5 months ago

Oh, what a surprise. Another AI spat out some more bullshit. I can't wait until companies finally give up on trying to do everything with AI.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

I can’t wait until companies finally give up on trying to do everything with AI.

I don't think that will ever happen.

They're acceptable of AI driving car accidents that causes harm happen. It's all part of the learning / debugging process to them.

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

AI isn't inherently bad. Once AI cars cause less accidents than human drivers (even if they still cause some accidents) it will be moral to use them on roads.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

No, cars need to end. Move to trains.

[-] anon987@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

AI cars already cause drastically less accidents. And the accidents they do cause are overwhelmingly minor.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago

Beware, terminally incompetent interns everywhere. Doing something incredibly damaging to your company over social media on your first day is officially a job that’s been taken by AI.

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

Something to do with Twitter and Elon was disinformation? I'm keeling over in shock.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 months ago

I don't really understand this headline

The bot made it? So why was it promoted as trending?

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 months ago

It’s pretty, trending is based on . . . What’s trending by users.

Or as the article explains for those who can’t comprehend what trending means.

Based on our observations, it appears that the topic started trending because of a sudden uptick of blue checkmark accounts (users who pay a monthly subscription to X for Premium features including the verification badge) spamming the same copy-and-paste misinformation about Iran attacking Israel. The curated posts provided by X were full of these verified accounts spreading this fake news alongside an unverified video depicting explosions.

[-] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Amusingly Grok also spat a headline about how police were being deployed to shoot the earthquake after being exposed to a sarcastic tweet. https://i.imgur.com/qltkEsU.jpeg

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago

It does say it’s likely hyperbole, so they probably just tazed and arrested the earthquake.

Also I’m impressed by the 50,000 to 1,000,000 range for officers deployed. It leaves little room for error.

[-] PopShark@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I wonder if the wide margin is the AI trying to formulate logic and numbers in the story but it realizes it doesn’t know how many officers would be needed to shoot the earthquake since it would logically depends on the magnitude of the earthquake which the AI doesn’t know so it figures well alright tectonic plates are rather resistant to firearms discharge and other potential law enforcement tactics so it starts high at 50,000 but decides 1,000,000 is a reasonable cap as there just can’t be more than that many officers present in the state or country

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Wow. What a world we live in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Same similiar thing happened with major newspapers about 100 / 150 years ago ... governments realized that if any one group or company had control over all the information without regulation, businesses will quickly figure out ways to monetize information for the benefit of those with all the money and power. They then had to figure out how to start regulating newspapers and news media in order to maintain some sort of control and sanity to the entire system.

But like the newspapers of old .... no one will do anything about all this until it causes a major crisis or causes a terrible event ... or events.

In the meantime ... big corporations controlling 99% of all media and news information will stay unregulated or regulated as little as possible until terrible things happen and society breaks down.

[-] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Skynet has begun

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

Not to defend elon here but so what? Is it his job?

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 30 points 5 months ago

As CEO he is ultimately responsible for his platform. So yes, in the end it's his responsibility. It's why he gets paid the big bucks.

[-] cygon@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I assume that Twitter still has tons of managers and team leads that allowed this and have their own part of the responsibility. However, Musk is known to be a choleric with a mercurial temper, someone who makes grand public announcements and then pushes his companies to release stuff that isn't nearly ready for production. Often it's "do or get fired".

So... an unshackled AI generating official posts, no human hired to curate the front page, headlines controlled through up-voting by trolls and foreign influence campaigns, all running unchecked in the name of "free speech" -- that's very much on brand for a Musk-run business, I'd say.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
882 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58146 readers
4523 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS