466
shameless b8 (mander.xyz)
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ultimitchow@sh.itjust.works 137 points 8 months ago

americans carefully using imperial units instead of metric to waste time of the rest of the world

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 46 points 8 months ago
[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That was the most confusing discussion I've heard in a while. Don't even know what the initial question was. Had to rewatch the video

What's the difference between 6 and 7/8t and 7 and 1/4

The initial answer of 3/8 was right, but then he changed it and I just got confused.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[-] Krudler@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Okay so NASA lost a $327 million Mars probe because said was transmitting trajectory corrections in the SI Units of Newton-Seconds, but the home base software was interpreting and calculating it as Pound Seconds.

Remembering that there was endless amounts of scientific equipment aboard that took years to make, and the whole enchilada took 10 months traveling through space before it could even crash.

[-] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 51 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

wasting time

getting used to converting between units.

Pick one.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

I’ll have you know converting out of slugs was absolutely a waste of time. My prof searing 2.54cm/in into my brain was quite useful though

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If your goal is to teach new material, you teach that material specifically. You dont mix other things into it because 1) it makes it harder for them to learn that new material and 2) it makes it harder for you to figure out what they dont understand.

[-] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago

That is actually not backed by science. Mixing material is a lot more effective than focusing on one thing.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Especially when teaching chemistry

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This is not true. I literally have to fix conceptual issues that students have because people do this to them.

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

[Citation needed]

I have tutored thousands of students. You are going to need to back what you say with relevant evidence.

[-] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

The only thing I quickly found is this paper, which says that learning multiple things is not better nor worse than one thing at a time, but it also states in the abstract that cognitive psychologists believed up to that point that mixing multiple topics is beneficial.

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That paper isnt dealing with the same issue that I am talking about. Learning chinese isn't going to compromise someones' ability to understand physics. (Unless the problem is written in chinese I guess) But being weak on unit conversion will absolutely compromise their capability to learn a concept where the first problems they are meant to solve are written in a way that requires unit conversions.

In my experience tutoring thousands of students, one of the most common scenarios that I see is that a student struggled in an area like that, was taught in a way that relies on that weak skill to learn the new skill when that was not necessary and then struggled with the new skill as a result. Thats the sort of scenario that this thread is about. Mixing in concepts unnecessary to understanding into a problem thus overcomplicating it before the student has a solid grasp of the concept. That does make it harder for them to learn and its something bad teachers do.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 15 points 8 months ago

At least it's easy to remember the conversion between hours and seconds.

[-] lseif@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 months ago

if you ever forget, heres a neat mnemonic device: 3600, because 60*60=3600

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
466 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

11189 readers
2875 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS