Well, first of all, with our currrent understanding of physics, reversing entropy isn't even theoretically possible. Second, solar fusion has been happening for billions of years. It's how the sun works.

You don't respect when people do that. Taking their answer as less real than your own internal already decided ones while having a lesser understanding of it.

It's a common logical fallacy and it puts pressure on others to try to find things that you don't know what you are talking about about specifically and bring actual science to you that you won't understand this making them unable to convey to you that you are wrong.

Even just on carbon capture alone we will be unable to do any sort of simple or quick fix.

You demand others disprove you rather than prove yourself right. And it's easy to do because you are operating on a prayer and belief system when your opponents are forced to operate with facts and data.

Same tactics conservatives use cause everyone uses it to shelter their brain. Don't think yourself smart for doing it.

1. Solar fusion isn't a thing that exists as a technology (If anything, you're referring to the nuclear fusion in the core of a sun).
2. Nuclear fusion is a technology that does exists, but it's only just barely able to break even in highly experimental test setups. It does not reverse entropy.
3. You just simply can't reverse entropy, not matter what technology you use. It would violate the second law of thermodynamics. You can decrease entropy by moving a place with less entropy to a location with more entropy, but somewhere entropy would still increase more than you decreased it in the other place. Everything lost to heat is permanently lost.