609
submitted 2 months ago by meldrik@lemmy.wtf to c/facepalm@lemmy.wtf
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

It's not like we are talking about states rights to sell alcohol or do anything else.

It was specifically the rights of one state to force another state to enforce slavery. Again, if slavery were removed from the equation we would not be talking about the civil war as we know it. That doesn't mean a civil war wouldn't have happened for another reason, but it didn't, and entertaining any other reality is just fiction.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It was specifically the rights of one state to force another state to enforce slavery

Exactly.

And the Northern states and the Feds were cool with maintaining the status quo of legal slavery until halfway thru the Civil War.

So if the South hadn't gotten greedy and tried to force a strong federal government, slavery would have stayed legal. But they tried and both won and lost at the same time.

They got the strong federal government they asked for, it just wasn't on their side.

[-] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

And in what way does that hypothetical make the American civil war NOT about slavery?

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
609 points (100.0% liked)

Facepalm

354 readers
1 users here now

Anything that makes you apply your hand to your face.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS