610
submitted 1 year ago by meldrik@lemmy.wtf to c/facepalm@lemmy.wtf
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Like when people say it was over “states rights” but ignore the Feds sided with state’s rights, and the South was the one arguing for a stronger federal government.

The Southern states though they had the "right" to force northern states to return escaped slaves.

Not over if slavery was legal, but over if a slave was still a slave in a state that outlawed slavery.

But I don't even think you read the last comment if you had to ask that

[-] criitz@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

Is that really a big difference? The point is the south wanted their slaves and they rebelled against the north to keep them

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Is that really a big difference?

Huge.

The south thought of a slave as a slave. And their children would also be slaves.

The North viewed them as enslaved humans, who were just humans once they were in a state without slavery.

That is a deep and fundamental difference. It changes so much about how both sides viewed slavery. The North was ok with some escaping, but they really weren't going to lift a finger to stop it either.

While the South literally saw them as property.

If Lincoln had caved, it would have turned I to a total shit show. Not just northern cops, but "bounty hunters" who would likely grab any Black person they saw.

You really don't see why details are important? I can just let it go if it doesn't.

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
610 points (100.0% liked)

Facepalm

626 readers
1 users here now

Anything that makes you apply your hand to your face.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS