14
I really wish they'd use a different method.
(scryfall.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)
MTG
1933 readers
3 users here now
Magic: the Gathering discussion
General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!
Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
If you want a specific card, buy that card.
Ahh yes, from the 1st party wotc direct sale option so you don't have to pay higer prices for a card only available in the most expensive packs /s
@lovestha Yes, buying bloomburrow reprints are for the aesthetic. Collector booster packs have a higer premium for the aesthetics of foils. Having to pay collector booster prices, not for foils but set cards, is annoying.
Edit: I known people who have thier eyes on the set just for fox Jace, it's capitalism but annoying they have half the point of the set on jacked up prices, the other part of capitalism is we complain it's more than we'll pay.
Well yes, that's how it's done these days with these pull rates. Those cards are going to be significantly rarer than they have any right to be.
Why is Ral fine to be in the normal set but all the rest aren't? Why couldn't they just make some other set symbol for those cards that still only show up in collectors? it will be less confusing down the road.
Hell, outlaws of thunder junction had 4 separate set symbols throughout it not counting list and special guest. Two main with an elusive third doesn't seem like it'd be all that taxing.