221

Firefox added ad tracking and has already turned it on without asking you (mastodon.social)

submitted 2 years ago by makeasnek@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 109 points 2 years ago

Before people completely lose their mind: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/privacy-preserving-attribution

[-] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 30 points 2 years ago

Cheers, I was getting salty reading the op

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 33 points 2 years ago

Twitter and Mastodon with their short message chains only amplifies losing context, especially if the original post does not include all necessary information or source links.

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago

Yep this.

It’s gotten to the point where a character limit is itself a seriously toxic part of big-social social media, up there with algorithms and shitty moderation choices. But all of the Twitter people don’t see it.

Sure there are threads through reply chains. No one reads the chain. The first post is all most will see. Context collapse and superficiality is inevitable with this simple constraint. The fediverse should move on. Sadly, mastodon is the only platform still dedicated to it and they’re 80% of the fediverse.

If you like short funny quips and shit posts, that’s fine, there’s no character minimum! With long character limits, short quips still abound. Instead, when necessary, you can opt in to longer form text when necessary.

[-] Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

I hate to break it to you, but the character limit being integrated into the UI is inconsequential against the general preferences of humankind. Your 3 paragraph, well thought out statement is already too long to garner the upvotes a 2 word post will get in reply regardless of how good a post it is.

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

The number of people I've come across who also dislike the character limit, the number of platforms that don't have it, the number of times people write long microblogging threads and the prior and continued existence of the "blogosphere" count against this defeatist pessimism IMO.

The truly dark take here, IMO, is that we shouldn't underestimate the power of a medium's configuration to shape not just the content and culture on it (that's obvious) but the way its users come to think.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Why is Mozilla coming from the position that what advertisers want is reasonable or acceptable in any shape or form? The advertisement industry existed for centuries without the ability to spy on people and they were doing just fine.

Edit: this being opt-out instead of opt-in also violates the GDPR.

[-] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago

How does this violate the GDPR? It increases privacy and stops advertisers tracking everything you do. This seems to be a good thing.

Advertisers have always been interested in where their ads are seen and whether they convert to purchases. A common example is vouchers, which will tell the advertiser exactly this (10p off, customer redeems, store returns to advertiser, advertiser knows where you got the voucher from/where you saw the advert, where you bought the product - exactly what Firefox is trying to tell them)

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 years ago

Firefox creates a report based on what the website asks, but does not give the result to the website. Instead, Firefox encrypts the report and anonymously submits it using the Distributed Aggregation Protocol (DAP) to an “aggregation service”.

Mozilla can't send user data to an "aggregation service" without explicit consent, no matter how much propaganda they use to explain it.

[-] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

But it's OK to send more - and probably PII - tracking data directly to the website without consent?

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 years ago

Also no. But 2 wrongs don't make a right.

You are speaking like there are only two alternatives and none of them involves following the law.

[-] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago

In which case I suggest you file a GDPR violation against all web browsers, as by default they will be allowing tracking and sending data to advertisers.