607
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Darryl Anderson was drunk behind the wheel of his Audi SUV, had his accelerator pressed to the floor and was barreling toward a car ahead of him when he snapped a photo of his speedometer. The picture showed a car in the foreground, a collision warning light on his dashboard and a speed of 141 mph (227 kph).

An instant later, he slammed into the car in the photo. The driver, Shalorna Warner, was not seriously injured but her 8-month-old son and her sister were killed instantly, authorities said. Evidence showed Anderson never braked. 

Anderson, 38, was sentenced Tuesday to 17 years in prison for the May 31 crash in northern England that killed little Zackary Blades and Karlene Warner. Anderson pleaded guilty last week in Durham Crown Court to two counts of causing death by dangerous driving.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] whocares314@lemmy.world 74 points 2 months ago

PSA: your local fire precinct (in the USA, probably England too) can do a car seat installation and fit check for you. Strap your kids in, and strap them TIGHT. It can be very easy to install a seat improperly, I had mine checked when I was a new parent until I was confident I had it right.

Before anyone flames me for victim blaming I am 100% not blaming the mother. It is quite possible that at those speeds the child would have died regardless, and the driver deserves every day in jail that he spends.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 29 points 2 months ago

I'm almost 100% certain that a 141MPH impact absolutely destroyed everything that the car seat was attached to. There was an accident posted on reddit a couple years ago (from either L.A. or Texas) where a guy was going something like 120MPH and hit stopped traffic on the highway. His vehicle completely sheared off the upper half of the car he hit first and then shot over several vehicles before hitting a building probably 30 yards off the side of the freeway. A car traveling that fast carries an insane amount of energy.

[-] BillThePlatypus@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Energy goes up with the square of velocity. A car going 140 MPH has 4x the energy of a car going 70. Assuming a 3,000 lb car, there was about as much energy in the car as 1.4 lb (.64 kg) of TNT, but applied in a single direction, much more efficiently than an explosion would. Modern cars are impressively safe, but there probably wasn't much left.

Edit: He was driving an SUV, ~5000 lb, so closer to 2.4 lb (1.1 kg) of TNT. It's a miracle that anybody survived.

[-] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

But take into account that the woman was also driving at certain speed when he hit her. If she was driving at 100MPH then his speed relative to her was just 41MPH

[-] rekorse@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Why would we assume the victim was speeding too?

[-] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I think his math is bad because he just went with a cool round number.

But, more realistically, she was probably going somewhere between 55-70 mph (don't know road or highway or whatever) and that's still a difference of 70-90 miles an hour. So I'd say yeah, the seat check MIGHT prevent harm if you're super duper lucky but I don't think that baby's walking away from that with anything less than life threatening injuries

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago
[-] Bruhh@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

please be patient with me i am autistic

[-] Bruhh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It honestly gave me a really good laugh.

[-] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

miles is not a unit I am familiar with. I certainly wasn't suggesting the woman was speeding or slowing down just that her speed (whatever it was) should be taken in consideration when estimating the severity of impact.

Of course this is all theoretical since we do know for a fact that two people were killed

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago

Right, but they're not particles travelling through a vacuum. Even a tiny contact at highway speeds is enough to send one or both cars rolling.

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

You should not strap them TIGHT, but you should make sure they're not loose. Too tight is a thing and can result in additional pressure/exertion, which leads to bending of parts, fraying, and stripping of components, ultimately making things less safe. The key is to be just right.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
607 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38578 readers
1364 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS