842
submitted 1 year ago by mondoman712@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ansik@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] b3nsn0w@pricefield.org 17 points 1 year ago

there is no bike lane on that side of the road though

(also, you can embed images with the ![alt text](https://image_url) syntax

[-] ansik@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Do you go both ways on bike lanes? In Sweden I'd often go in the car lane but never against the flow of traffic

Thats how I embedded it, does it appear weird for you? I'm on kbin if that might be the problem

[-] b3nsn0w@pricefield.org 5 points 1 year ago

you forgot the exclamation mark from the front of your image embed. the syntax is kinda confusing, [this is a link](image_url), ![this is an image](image_url)

also, i'm no expert in bike lanes, but it seems to me that the original idea here was that the bikes would go onto the wide sidewalk over here, but that doesn't seem to be very well-communicated. where i live (budapest) we have some sidewalk-bike lane combos, but they're marked, and when they're not, pedestrians have a priority and sidewalks can be frustrating for cyclists.

[-] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It looks like a regular hyperlink, you need to tap it to see the picture. For embedded pictures you leave the alt text blank. Also no you stay on the same direction as cars. The problem is this bike crossing doesn't lead anywhere, there is no bike lane coming this direction. And you should typically ride to the right of cars but it might be ok to be on the other curb when it's a one-way street like this.

[-] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

For embedded pictures you leave the alt text blank

That's not necessary. I usually leave it in so visually impaired people know what the image is about

[-] ansik@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thanks! I moved the alt-text, hope it works now!
The bike crossing leads to a bike lane going eastbound on E Broadway, it comes from a one way street with no bike-lane. It's on the wrong side since it's only for bikers turning left, bikers turning right will continue on the right shoulder of the lane.

Still dumb but the only real problem I have with it is that bikes are expected to cross 6 lanes of traffic going who knows how fast with no stop light.

Edit: added a few lines to the sketch in my earlier comment to better show what I'm meaning, maybe

[-] rbos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The part that makes me feel least safe is the brief shared space with cars going between two bike lanes. To continue along the greenway from Victoria, you need to cross and do a ~50m stretch along Broadway, cars bearing down behind you. And the right turn off is not obvious - I missed it the first time I went. It's not at all clear where the path continues.

edit: fine, I suppose the un-controlled six-lane crossing is also pretty bad...

[-] Anders429@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, because bicycles sharing the lane with cars for random stretches works so well. No one's life is in danger here! /s

[-] liara@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cars can't actually drive down this road anymore. The only vehicle traffic allowed through this area is busses turning around and taking their breaks at the end of the line.

I guess you can technically access parts of this road through the alley way but there are definitely bollards up at the Broadway end and the other end is right turn only for busses. This area is not high vehicle traffic

[-] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

The only arrow on there that looks intentful is the vertical blue arrow. Everything else is just regular stroad, and their threshold for a bicycle """way"" being unsafe is apparently when it starts perpendicularly crossing four lanes of traffic at once. And even then it only deserves a partial coat of paint ending in a 90° turn into a bicycle gutter.

That's not "designed", that'd be an insult to road design&engineering. That's a council member who took an exasperated sigh, angrily drew a straight line on a google earth printout, and said "now stop bothering me with this fucking cycling nonsense, I am already late for my kids' soccer match".

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
842 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9881 readers
4 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS