Once an organization can no longer claim an accessibility accomodation is an undue burden, then various laws kick in dictating how that accessibility accomodation must be managed.

What…? The laws applies to everyone, you can’t just claim I can’t afford it. Got a source please?

As was pointed out, many radio stations do provide captions, and in doing so, fall under the same laws about how they managed those captions.

Where was this pointed out? Most don’t, and the few that do just link to other places, something Spotify could do to with what you’re claiming. Why do they need to provide the actual words when radios don’t? Another source on this would be great. You’re already saying the laws apply differently, but are the same? You’ve contradicted yourself multiple times already….

Spotify is also a big enough organization that any claim of "undue burden" would probably not hold up in court, anyway.

Source that’s a thing.

While a small local radio station might well be protected, and is a good example of why such exceptions exist.

So I can just claim I don’t make enough and not need to follow any ADA laws? That doesn’t sound right, even non-profits get riddled with ads claims, so again, source please!

We all know you’re talking out of your ass, so yeah I don’t expect any actual response, so enjoy your weekend troll!