776
submitted 5 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world 194 points 5 months ago

Can we finally agree capitalism doesn’t give a fuck about anything but profits and therefore CANNOT self regulate?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

Jon Stewart had an excellent monologue about the myth of corporate morality yesterday.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWVbZ0WQ3s8

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I love how they gave Jon Stewart his show back and he's been using it to burn every single thing he can, including them.

[-] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago

Wait, he's back on the Daily Show?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Yes, but only Mondays. He's been hitting it out of the park though.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 5 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=TWVbZ0WQ3s8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

It's money. Every other form of economy has also exploited people for gain.

[-] WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Money existed before capitalism. Capitalism started in the 1700s. Money far predates capitalism. Plus, my comment is that capitalism must be regulated by outside regulators like governments. Conservatives have pushed deregulation forever and it’s made things worse. Capitalism worked far better in the heavy regulation days after WW2.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Money existed before capitalism. Capitalism started in the 1700s. Money far predates capitalism.

Yes, thank you explaining what I said. Mucho appreciato

[-] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

So we're just supposed to stop coming up with better ideas?

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

If that's what you want to do, go for it. I didn't say anything like that.
I'm just pointing out it's not capitalism.

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

~~In this case, I can believe that Chiquita didn't set out to finance the AUC, but was unfortunate in that their banana plantations fell into AUC-controlled territory, and therefore were extorted for protection money.~~

~~It's like if I owned an Italian restaurant, the mafia comes in and extorts me for protection money, then the feds come and arrest me for financing the mafia. What was I supposed to do?~~

edit: I didn't know about Chiquita. Thanks for the replies and info!

[-] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

No, it's like if you owned a massive chain of Italian restaurants that notoriously exploited people, and you were actively paying the mafia to intimidate your workers and to bust unions.

The judge saw through Chiquita's ridiculous fabrication, I'm disappointed to see you parroting it here.

[-] WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Chiquita / United Fruit have long been involved in oppressing and destabilizing south America for profit.

[-] goldenbug@fedia.io 10 points 5 months ago

There is enough proof in the trials to show they were not unhappily contributing to paramilitary groups.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Chiquita has been bad for a long, long time. Even among the banana companies, they're famously evil.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago
[-] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's a false analogy. Chiquita were paying the paramilitary to do its bidding.

Here is a more in-depth article.

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

~~Enjoy your burned out restaurant...~~

edit: I retract my comment due to prior ignorance about Chiquita's corporate behavior.

[-] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

isn't that the point? The corruption has tricked us to believing they can regulate themselves or are even not amoral about social issues. Companies make profit -- that is their singular goal. The laws and regulations control their behavior, not 'good will' or whatever we pretend motivates individuals

[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

It's the definition of capitalism

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
776 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39161 readers
1614 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS