383

people have been demonizing it for most of the AD years i think but it's quite pleasant really. are there any proven negative effects?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] echo@lemmings.world 249 points 5 months ago
[-] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 111 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'd like to go a bit deeper.

I don't think people invented socially controlling practices because they found religion, I think they found religion to frame the invention of socially controlling practices.

Masturbation is a gratifying act that relives pressure to settle into a rigid domestic arrangement that serves to make more workers and soldiers, and create dependents that need fed, and whose well-being would be threatened if a parent became defiant and provoked the ire of elites.

Masturbation is good for the individual at the expense of the nation and its rulers. So it's inevitable that priests would decry it as an affront against god, as that's historically been their purpose.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 61 points 5 months ago

I'd like to go a bit deeper.

go on...

[-] ButWhatDoesItAllMean@sh.itjust.works 32 points 5 months ago

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago
[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 30 points 5 months ago

Their statement started off with "I don't think" which generally means it's an opinion that may or may not have evidence. As long as they don't present it as truth and fact, it doesn't really need a citation.

[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

That an opinion lacks evidence does not alleviate the requirement that its factual allegations be supported by evidence. "I don't think the surface of the earth is curved" may be an opinion, but it's a provably wrong assertion, and adding a disclamitory phrase to it doesn't excuse the statement from evaluation.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 months ago

this is a message board not a dissertation, nobody has to do shit

[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah, my bad. I forgot how cool it is to just spout whatever bullshit you want. Hurray for ignorance.

No wonder humanity is doomed.

[-] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Similar to the claim that god exists 🤔

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Then you should simply call that person a dumb ass and move on in that scenario. And their statement was loaded with qualifiers that indicates to the audience to not take their claim seriously. This isn't debate club or a Congressional hearing. It's a niche internet forum.

[-] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 29 points 5 months ago

Which part? I think this is all subjective opinion.

[-] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I don't think..., I think...

Citation needed.

Yeah, here you go: https://slrpnk.net/comment/9178525

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Defeat the ruling class... jerk off

this is exactly the truth

[-] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

Pretty sad when religion claims to abhor evil, happens to be the source of a lot of it. Right? I can’t name a single thing religion ever did for me other than make me miserable.

[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 16 points 5 months ago

IMO, and without actual data to back it up, I reckon religion (and religious difference) is responsible for the most suffering throughout the history of humankind.

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I feel like even without religion we’d find ways to make each other miserable ‘cause we’re just an awesome species like that.

[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 13 points 5 months ago

Yeah, no dispute here, mate. We're pretty shocking like that. But I think religion stands out as an example of the worst, most inventive way we've come up with to subjugate and hurt people.

As a species, we've convinced ourselves that religion should be protected rather than inspected. We let lots of bad things happen in the name of religion. It's bullshit.

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago
[-] pearable@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

I don't think it's the source. I think it's a tool of social control that enables the powerful to create a bare minimum willingness to be ruled. For a long time the doctrine of Christianity was the Divine Right of Kings. Now it's the Prosperity Gospel. The books did not change but the people with all the money and power ensured the church leaders who served their interest had most of the money and thus followers.

If we didn't have religion, some other social construct would arise, and I'd argue, has arisen to fulfill it's role. Modern economic theory justifies the current power order in an unfalsifiable way that reminds me of religion.

Religion could be a liberatory force in society. In fact it has been. The liberation theology movement in South America and numerous heretical movements in the late medieval period are both examples of progressive Christian social movements.

[-] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Thank you. I think anyone who spends a lot of time reading about history comes to these conclusions.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
383 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35776 readers
560 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS