807
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago

There aren't "slaves" in git, though. The term "master" in that context is that of a master copy.

[-] steventhedev@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Nope. Bitkeeper used it in the master-slave pairing and the term was carried forward. Gitlab did a whole writeup about it.

[-] xilona@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 months ago

"Historically, the default name for this initial branch was master. This term came from Bitkeeper, a predecessor to Git. Bitkeeper referred to the source of truth as the "master repository" and other copies as "slave repositories". This shows how common master/slave references have been in technology, and the difficulty in knowing how the term master should be interpreted."

Excerpt from the link the other member posted above! You're welcome!

[-] Miaou@jlai.lu 7 points 10 months ago

It's funny, because a quick online search shows gitlab runs operations in Saudi Arabia. But at least a bunch of idiot westerners get to feel good about themselves 🤷‍♂️

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And a master copy is used to produce slaves - though slave isn't widespread in version control it's still quite present in databases. And it all comes from the same Master/Slave naming habit.

[-] OpFARv30@lemmy.ml 25 points 10 months ago

It doesn't. See: master tapes and the mastering process.

Sorry, the maining process.

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
807 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

35346 readers
5 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS