411
submitted 10 months ago by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] shani66@ani.social 10 points 10 months ago

Couldn't care less about killing and eating animals, but it's pretty fucked how we go about it.

[-] chetradley@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

It's all fucked, from the way we've bred them, to how we treat them while they're alive, to how we kill them. To me, perhaps the worst part is we do it almost exclusively for enjoyment.

[-] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What? The meat industry is for food. What are you actually talking about

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago

It's an inefficient form of food, requiring more nutrients than we get out of it. But we like eating meat (it's delicious after all), so in theory it is purely for our enjoyment.

Though we also use it to feed our cats I suppose.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's also a great way of turning food that grows in soil too poor to plant anything else in that humans can't get any nutrition out of at all, like grass, into food we can

[-] chetradley@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Most people eat animal products because they enjoy them more than the available plant-based alternatives.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago
[-] chetradley@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I appreciate the B99 reference, but the difference between animal products and the plant based alternatives is small and getting smaller by the day. At the end of the day, it's that difference in enjoyment you get that you are weighing against supporting inhumane practices like the one in this post

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

As Holt demonstrates, not everyone chooses the more enjoyable and less moral choice. (For Holt there isn't a moral reason, he's just disinterested, but nonetheless makes the same choice of not choosing to enjoy food.)

At the end of the day, it's why there are so many so viable vegan alternatives nowadays.

Nowadays it'd be somewhat easy to fool a non-vegan into thinking they're eating meat, occasionally at least. Trying to pull that off 20 years ago would've been impossible.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

"I have zero interest in food. If it were feasible, my diet would consist entirely of flavorless beige smoothies containing all the nutrients required by the human animal."

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
411 points (100.0% liked)

196

17447 readers
666 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS