562
Neverminding the evidence to the contrary.
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
562 points (100.0% liked)
memes
16604 readers
3043 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I didn't even take a stance on what the teeth mean for diet. I was just correcting you lol.
I mean the source you provided literally says the bottom canines are less pointy and pronounced than the top set, especially in humans, so I don't feel very corrected? You keep at it though, I believe in you!
Less pointy != not pointy but go off bb.
Go rip some fresh animal flesh straight off the bone with those pointy bad boys then, bb.
The bottom what? Bottom canines? So you're arguing they're not what they are literally called?
What ad hominem is that?
Was that meant as an ad hominem? I thought you didn't like those.
Garbage was a reference to what you were adding to the "discussion", not you as a person, so doesn't qualify as ad hominem.
Same for gibbering nonsense.
Yes, you add garbage into the conversation (disingenuous questions) and you get garbage out (me ignoring the question).
That's another word you got wrong. I'm not sidestepping anything. I am blatantly ignoring it.
Or is it only fun when you're doing it?
Oh, so you have an argument now?
Nobody arguing in good faith says:
If you feel like your argument has been misinterpreted, or that a counter argument is irrelevant, someone who is arguing in good faith would restate their argument to indicate why the counter argument was irrelevant. Not "guess what my argument is" so that they can avoid stating something that would have to actually defend.
Your entire post was a "no you". Pointing out your insincerity and hypocrisy is not a tu quoque, because I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm just pointing out your insincerity and hypocrisy.
Ah yes, that classic markers of someone having a good faith discussion:
(There's another of your trademark ad hominem attacks!)
And how, pray tell, does the name 'canines' factor into your argument? I'm dying to know.
I never had an argument. Just pointing out the flaws in yours.
What's my argument? What are the flaws?? I'm listening.
If you don't even know then I guess you're just gibbering nonsense.
Cool, thanks. Very helpful. Loving talking to you, it's been so constructive.
As they say: garbage in, garbage out.
Clearly.