1185
Reminder... (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 39 points 6 months ago

You acknowledge that you're voting for a slightly slower descent into fascism but that you'll continue to do so?

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 131 points 6 months ago

As opposed to a faster descent? Yes absolutely.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

So your solution to avoiding fascism is to never lose an election?

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 44 points 6 months ago

My solution is to exercise my right to vote.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Yes, by all means, exercise your right to vote as you see fit. But if the only way we can avoid fascism is by never losing an election, shouldn't we be seeking better ideas and stronger protections from fascism now before that plan fails?

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 34 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If you don't vote you're not a part of the conversation. You obviously don't have any grasp on how the election process works anyways, so why are you even keyboard warrioring this at all?

Go back to playing music, Jesse.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Perhaps engage with mutual respect. I do vote. I vote in every election. I'm also very aware of how US politics work.

[-] realbadat@programming.dev 19 points 6 months ago

Then you should know that to move things left, you need to vote more local progressives.

People don't start out going for the presidency (and they shouldn't, as the obvious recent mistake of a president shows).

Slowing down fascism provides opportunity for progressive politicians to make moves in the right direction, and take positions that are higher up the ladder.

Allowing a nose dive to fascism prevents the progressive folks from having an opportunity.

In short - yes, slowing it down is good enough at the presidential level.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So, what do you think will happen if you continue to encourage people who dislike both candidates to abstain from voting?

One of the two candidates will win, and one of the two candidates will take office in January. Hopefully they are both the same person.

It sucks that the choice is "who is less bad". But that's US politics for you. Not voting for the less bad is not going to make anything better.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I'm not saying that either. I told you to use your right how you see fit. It is not my place to tell you how to vote, nor is it my place to negatively pressure strangers into voting for my preference. I think everyone should vote. I'm also saying that promising votes to politicians regardless of their actions indicate that their actions won't hurt their chances.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You have to choose your words more carefully. There's a lot of astroshitting all over the place. Should expect no less, if the primary races and 2016 and 2020 were any indication.

I agree "vote blue no matter who" is potentially dangerous. However at this current juncture, it really doesn't matter. Republicans can't be allowed to have control of another branch. They've shown their hand, and are pulling no punches. Straight up lies, exaggerations, and accusations fueling a culture war in a strategy to get to 270 with as little a popular vote as possible.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bolexforsoup 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

spoilerasdfasfasfasfas

[-] Holyginz@lemmy.world 67 points 6 months ago

You have a good point. Obviously we should vote for it to happen faster rather than try to use the slow descent to fix things.

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I wonder how many accelerationists around here are fascists/explodingheads users. Fascists don't fear the prospect of pretending to be something they aren't if it means furthering their agenda.

They're not afraid of posing as, say, a disenfranchised, discouraged and disillusioned left-winger who believes both sides are bad and there's no future except revolution.

They're not afraid to post about how "Genocide Joe" is funding genocide in Gaza while neglecting to point out how "Totalitarian Trump" would send B-52s to carpet bomb Gaza and the West Bank until nothing is left.

They're not afraid to point out how red states are still succeeding in trampling over LGBT rights under Biden while also ignoring how Trump would almost certainly push for that nation-wide.

They'll cry about our current supreme court justices while ignoring that Trump was the one who put those justices in power to begin with.


To be clear, I think the US is pretty far from saving and that it'll take a miracle to save this country from ruin. However, I'd rather see the country collapse slowly and in a relatively controlled manner that gives people time to prepare for its demise; while also giving people time to attempt to patch and fix the holes.

Revolution is high risk, high reward; if the left-wing wins, then you might get the socialist utopia you've always dreamed of. However, what if the right-wing wins? Yanno, the people with the majority of privately owned guns in the US. What if they win?

A Trump presidency means your leftist revolution against a fascist government will almost certainly be opposed by both rednecks and the US military.

However, if the fascists revolt during a Biden presidency, then the military will likely be backing you.

In the event of armed revolution, the president, whether it's Biden or Trump, will use the military to protect and reinforce their power. With Trump, opposition to his power will be coming from the left, so that's who the military will target. With Biden, the opposition will come from the right, and so the military will target them instead.

Of course, that doesn't mean you'll get the leftist utopia you've always dreamed, but at least you'll remove a lot of fascists from the equation. Removing those fascists means it'll be easier for the country to swing to the left and stay there. It won't happen overnight, but the result would likely be a government far more stable than if you tried to burn everything down and start over from scratch.

The reason why I say all this is because I feel that we are closing in on a revolution. Something is about to snap, and it will happen either during the elections or soon after. As such, you really, really don't want Trump, because Trump means you'll be fighting against the biggest, most well-funded and technologically equipped military in the world.


The air is tense and electric, filled with gasoline fumes and heated by our exhaust. The masses are shuffling to and from their workplaces, burned-out and overworked. They are struggling to afford rent, afford food, afford sleep and water. Static electricity is building on their shuffling bodies, and soon a spark will leap from an outstretched finger, igniting the air and bathing the US in fire.

I hope I'm wrong.

[-] MicrondeMMMMMMM 16 points 6 months ago

I agree. Although I'm not as pessimistic as you are, I truly believe that the US can become a socialist country, I'm young though 😅

I hadn't considered some right wing bigots would be on here and was arguing with ppl. Thx! :)

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 9 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I'll admit that I'm pretty jaded and cynical when it comes to politics and the future of humanity. I'm not all that old either, but I'm old enough to remember how it seemed like life was getting better until Trump took office, and how much the US tumbled as a result.

I'm old enough to remember when being left or right wing was a debate and not a fight between competing "truths"; and how the US left and right wing were sometimes willing to compromise on issues instead of fighting a culture war where they try and see how badly they can fuck up the US and still successfully blame the other party.

I'm old enough to remember when people typically trusted the news and science; and conspiracy theorists were amusing nutjobs at best, harmless annoyances at worst.

I'm old enough to remember when the idea of a Christian theocracy in the US was considered insane by anyone except the most extreme conservatives; while militias were something only domestic terrorists and the most extreme political radicals supported.

And I'm honestly, not that old. I just... I've watched the downward spiral and it seems like no one in power actually wants to stop it, which is why I've become so jaded and cynical. It's why I think revolution is coming, and I'm just hoping that the political ideology I'm aligned with won't be forced into fighting a losing war against the US military.

That's why I think people should support Biden. No, he's not a good person, and I don't think he honestly has the best interests of America and the rest of the world in mind. Sure, he's tried to do some good things like (unsuccessfully) forgiving student loans multiple times and showing support for America's unions, however he's still enabling Israel's genocide and he's still beholden to the corporations that fund his party (which means he'll avoid real changes whenever possible). Yet, if Biden gets elected and the American right-wing revolts (I'm convinced they'll try), then the US military will be fighting them, not us. If Trump gets elected then there may not even be a chance for revolution before cops start kicking people's doors down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago

You know what is definitely not fixing it? Reassuring the Dems at every step that they will have your vote no matter what, as long as they are only slightly better than the Reps. Actually it is directly encouraging them to be at their possible worst.

Think of politicians as children and you as their parent. Do you think "reaffirm your child that no matter what it does, it will always get its favorite dessert" is a good parenting strategy? You raise egocentric psychopaths this way and this is exactly what you are getting as politicians.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 6 months ago

That's what the primary is for.

If you have a dem that no longer aligns with your interests, you vote them out during the primary.

But then you show up during the general, hold your nose, and vote Democrat.

Want to know why?

Because the Republicans will vote Republican no matter what and we've unfortunately pushed our democracy to the point where we either vote for the somewhat okay guy or the guy that will bite your face off.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago

Yes, the dnc money machine is definitely allowing that. /s

[-] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 13 points 6 months ago

I'm not noticing any part of "I'll accept anything" that's particularly conducive to fixing things

[-] bolexforsoup 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

And 5 month ago it was double that time and people already screamed that pointing out that an alternative to two genocidal geriatrics is needed were screamed down as being Trump puppets.

We already wasted half of that time to find a solution with people being vigorously opposed to demanding a solution as they are afraid to lose the status quo.

[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Cmon dude, we can read your history.

People are not calling you a Trump puppet because you criticise Biden. People are arguing with you because you think not voting is a solution that Democrats are actually affected by.

By not voting, you just ensure the person you want the least to be in office wins (Trump). There's plenty of shills trying to discourage people from voting with that rhetoric. Republicans only win when dems don't show up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 19 points 6 months ago

The political cycle is not 10 months long. Or 24. Or 48.

If you want change, you need to be involved in pushing over a large number of heavy objects over a long period of time. No one candidate, no one election, is going to change anything.

Because your damn country isn't "descending into fascism", it's been bathing in it for centuries, and every time there's someone trying to lift y'all kicking and screaming out of it just a little bit, the totalitarians crop up to try and self-destruct it all. Then, suddenly, a bunch of you come out of the woodwork to declare that it's better to blow it all up, actually, than to do literally anything to stop it, because you believe there should be a quick and easy solution, and everyone else around you is just an idiot for not seeing it.

But you only believe that because you're some kind of self-important, hubris-huffing sucker.

[-] bolexforsoup 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

Declare to the Dems "I'll only vote you, if you stop genocide, internment camps and start taxing the rich properly." Then follow through with it. Already saying you dont want to follow through with it is telling them, that they dont need to listen to you. This is the only language they understand. Ideally look into organizing for a third party, so the Dems can be overtaken by a better third party which can take their place in the political system. The DNC has proven time and time again that they will be authoritarian and undemocratic to ensure no actually progressive candidate to make it into their leadership.

[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

I hate Biden, and I do think that voting isn't going to solve our problems, but do you really think that NOT voting is going to solve our problems? Democrats know that they're always going to me more left than the Republicans, which will be enough for most people, and that very few people are going to try holding out for leftward change that could've been voted in during the primaries but wasn't.

What we need to do is vote for Biden to prevent Trump from destroying the country in 2 weeks flat, then actually force change. Voting works great when the system works, but it's been broken for a while - we need real action now, up to and including a revolution if need be.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] protist@mander.xyz 13 points 6 months ago

Hear me out...

  1. Invent time machine

  2. ?

  3. The candidate I want most gets elected.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] norbert@kbin.social 21 points 6 months ago

You're just an accelerationist. Fatalism, nihilism, apathy, hopeless, etc aren't anything new, most of us disagree with you. I wonder if your outlook would improve if you got therapy or if you had a little skin in the game and stood to lose something.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago

If they were an accelerationist, wouldn't they be voting for Trump?

[-] norbert@kbin.social 14 points 6 months ago
  1. Not necessarily.

  2. Who says they aren't?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not necessarily

Why not? You're claiming they're operating on a principle of trying to accelerate collapse, and that Trump is the candidate to do that. But this is completely inconsistent with what the person is saying they'll do. It doesn't explain their behavior.

Who says they aren’t?

So we're just making things up whole cloth about people now?

[-] norbert@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago

It's cute of you to step in to defend your alt account, but you can't be serious.

They're an accelerationist, for whatever reason, they want collapse. The quicker it happens the better, they admitted as much above.

You're supposing that Trump is the candidate to do that, I think most of lemmy would agree with you so I'll cede that point.

That point ceded, we can agree most of lemmy won't vote for Trump right? So what would be the point of talking about voting Trump here? It's far more effective for the accelerationist (who likely isn't conservative anyway) to be a "leftist" who's so disgusted with how corrupt and unfair the system is they simply just check out and encourage others to check out as well, "both sides are the same" of course.

So we're just making things up whole cloth about people now?

We're inferring things, it's quite a bit different comrade.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 8 points 6 months ago

Yes the point of my comment was that I want fascism faster well done

[-] Holyginz@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

The little bit you have actually said has indicated that and you have done absolutely nothing to refute it so my advice is that sarcasm only works when the targeted recipient of it has been shown you would only say it sarcastically.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bstix@feddit.dk 17 points 6 months ago

It's more than yes/no to fascism.

In a democratic political party you can influence the politics democratically. In a fascist party: Not possible.

The country does not need to hit rock bottom before it can improve. It can be changed democratically from within if you allow it to by voting for anything but the party that will take away that possibility.

[-] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 13 points 6 months ago

Why would the democratic party listen to anything you have to say if they know you'll vote for them regardless?

[-] bolexforsoup 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] norbert@kbin.social 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You need to go take a civics class and stop trying to suppress the leftwing vote. Do you expect anyone to sit down and explain to you how campaigning for issues works? Do you expect us to list every decent win "the left" has gotten the last 5-10 years?

What have you gotten accomplished? What have you even participated in?

Just because you sit in a basement unplugged from reality, doomscrolling, doesn't mean the rest of should sit here and take advice from you. You admit you just want fascism faster.

Bad-faith, accelerationist, useful idiot. If it weren't so cliche I'd call you Vlad.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mashbooq@infosec.pub 10 points 6 months ago

Because of primaries

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Assuming you're not voting...

Do you acknowledge that you're voting for a coin toss between a slower descent or a faster descent into fascism? Averaging out to you being in favor of an even faster descent into fascism than the person you replied to?

[-] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago

That's not what not voting is, no

Do you acknowledge that voting for a candidate enacting bad policies is voting for those bad policies

[-] MicrondeMMMMMMM 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yes but not voting for that candidate is effectively just like voting for the other even worse guy.

I mean we both know that Biden ain't great, but Trump? Trump is far fuckXng worse! Don't like the genocide ? Biden is wayyyyyy more likely to sign a ceasefire than Trump. Want Trans Rights? Biden doesn't care, Trump wants to remove them. I'd rather have Biden's apathy than Trump's hate.

There is a Contrapoints video abt this : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3Vah8sUFgI

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
1185 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4417 readers
236 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS