89
submitted 11 months ago by nekandro@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gh0stcassette 39 points 11 months ago

Do they not still test the blood for HIV regardless of how "high risk" the donor is? You should be tested immediately prior to donation and the donation rejected if you test positive, this is a fuck-up on whoever took the blood. Also, prisoners??? Why in the fuck are we paying prisoners for their blood? Every private prison company should be nationalized and have its leaders tried for their crimes istg.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 16 points 11 months ago

This was in the 70s and 80s, they probably didn't have the tech. Kinda old news.

The new hotness is vampire facials at unlicensed clinics. They mix up your own blood with someone else's, or don't clean the centrifuge, you get infected.

[-] gh0stcassette 3 points 11 months ago

Ah fair, I didn't actually read the article, I just assumed it was semi-recent lol. Probably should have read it first

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The investigation only finished Monday, thousands of people already died and over 30k were infected

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Paying anyone for blood is a bad idea and this is why.

this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
89 points (100.0% liked)

World News

35618 readers
558 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS