2

thought I'd post it here as well for visibility

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Spoichiche@burggit.moe 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Honestly, while i can see why someone would be bothered by this, i don't think there's any solution to their concerns.

The whole point of this fediverse idea, as i see it, is that all the data is fundamentally controlled by a collection of entities instead of a centralised one. And you, as a mere user, have to choose which of these entities will have absolute full control of your data. Regardless of the source code of the webapp, if you're not fine with others having control of the data you willingly uploaded to their servers, the only way out is to self-host your data.

If you upload stuff on remote servers you don't control, you should always assume that you have no power over how that data is used. You can only hope for others to not be assholes, but you'll never have a true garantee.

[-] Scraft161@iusearchlinux.fyi 0 points 1 year ago

my problem doesn't lie in having to trust an instance to not store your data; but rather the platform itself keeping this data without a clear way of turning it off when setting up your instance (aside from modifying the source)

I agree that there's always trust needed and who you trust in the end is up to you so you as the end user should make an informed decision if you care about this.

[-] Spoichiche@burggit.moe 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think part of the reason why i don't care that much, is because i'm looking at it from a software developper's perspective.

Even without touching the source code, which would require quite a bit of effort simply to familiarize yourself with the codebase, the moment you get full access to the database it becomes 'trivial' (as long as you know some SQL) to do absolutely anything with the data.

Also, a somewhat common thing when working with databases is to never truly, permanently delete data, especially when the deletion comes from user-controlled actions. You can't trust users to not delete data they didn't want to delete and user accounts can also be compromised. Depending on the data itself, allowing total and permanent deletion can be very harmful and irrecoverable. When you don't fully delete the data but simply 'mark it as deleted', it's a lot easier to revert such problems. Even with the GDPR and the right to be forgoten, i don't have any stats on this but i'm pretty sure there's a lot of sites that simply mark things as deleted instead of a true permanent deletion.

edit: Forgot to mention that since bugs are also a thing, not actually deleting data can save your butt more than once.

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

General

4 readers
1 users here now

Feel like you have something to post, but it's not really relevant to any of the current communities, and you don't feel like it's worth making an entirely new community just to post it? This is the place for that.

NSFW content is allowed in this community so long as you mark it as per site rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS