454
submitted 11 months ago by naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

People have the right to have children, regardless of if the circumstances they'll be brought up in are up to your approval. To say they shouldn't have that right is not pro-choice, it's anti-natalist.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

Yes and who denies them having children?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago
[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

But you were literally pointing that out? Or would you say that your entire point is irrelevant and should be dismissed?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

No one is presently stopping people from having kids, but that doesn't mean that anti-natalism doesn't exist.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

Mhm...

Looks OP antinatalism

Yup I sure do exist. But that doesn't mean I would enforce others to not have kids.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Well, there you have it. Your position is wrong and awful, and I'm opposed to it and have no problem saying so. That's that.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

My position is awful because I decided for myself that I don't want kids? The fuck is wrong with you Mr Moral Apostle?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

That's not what anti-natalism is.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

Okay then I assumed wrong, my bad.

this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
454 points (100.0% liked)

World News

35414 readers
396 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS