454
Dutch woman, 29, granted euthanasia approval on grounds of mental suffering
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
454 points (100.0% liked)
World News
32347 readers
371 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Why are you assuming that her mental situation developed as a result of society or "the government"? The article mentions that her conditions are chronic and started developing in early childhood. People can have mental conditions without any particular external trigger.
She has trauma, according to the article. Most traumas are largely systemic issues that have been improperly handled.
Fair enough — though the trauma is also just one of the named conditions, and we have no idea what that trauma was caused by.
Depression and anxiety are also heavily influenced by societal conditions. She would probably still have to deal with these issues but to a much less QoL damaging extent under a more humane system.
She's run out of treatment options and is still symptomatic to the point that her quality of life is severely diminished.
It wasn't an overnight decision and has been reviewed by multiple medical teams, over 3 and a half years. All stated in the article.
You aren't her or any of the multiple doctors that have evaluated and tried various treatments with her. If you want to get into research and help look for cures for the vast, vast number of illnesses that contribute to people seeking this treatment, please do. Or help advocate for more money being funneled towards healthcare (including for education and training), cuz from what I understand there's not a single country or healthcare system that has adequate resources to help everyone just in terms of the number of people available to provide what treatments we do have
True, but people are also influenced by society starting from a young age.
The Netherlands does have a slightly higher than average suicide rate. Maybe it is because they allow euthanasia, so it's just easier than other similar countries ... I don't know.
I have mixed feelings too, like the poster you are responding to, but it is her choice. We let people sign up to potentially die to join the military when they aren't even adults yet. This was a decision made with the support of loved ones and caregivers.
This is speculated in the wiki as well and honestly I'm conflicted on it too. If people are choosing it more when it's more readily available, does that necessarily reflect badly on the people providing it? or does it reflect worse on the societies where people are suffering so badly that they probably would choose suicide if it was easier?
In a kind of parallel way to abortion here, ban abortion and you get lower abortion rates but higher rates of poverty and lower education rates. Safe abortion options lead to higher abortion rates, but the quality of life is better for those that make the choice to do it safely.
Of course in this case it's a bit different because the quality of life in assisted death is no life, but is no life better than a fucking miserable one?
It's a lot to think about but, like others in this thread, i generally believe the majority of today's mental health problems (specifically depression, anxiety, and to some extent addiction) are systemic societal problems. I know others disagree and I'm not trying to be dismissive of people's very real mental health struggles, but I mean that they are caused systemically in the way lung cancer became more common because of cigarettes. Our environment affects us.