73
you know what (kbin.melroy.org)
submitted 7 months ago by Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mlfh@lemmy.ml 51 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The resolution is actually quadrupled by doubling the value of both axes. In this case going from 1500x1424 (2.1MP) to 3504x3327 (11.7MP) multiplies the total number of pixels by 5.4

With the same level of jpeg compression you'd expect it to jump from 700KB to roughly 4MB. Since both images are the same file format, the rest of the file size difference is likely attributable to less jpeg compression being used in the larger image.

this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
73 points (100.0% liked)

196

16746 readers
3205 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS