33
Did Stanford just prototype the future of AR glasses?
(www.theverge.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
33 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
64653 readers
3774 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Stop trying to make AR glasses happen.
Why? I'd use the shit out of them at work. I work on construction sites. It'd be awesome to have an app to superimpose the finished plans on top of what I'm seeing so I don't have to constantly refer back to the paper prints. No more measuring shit five times, just install it exactly as you see it.
That's a pretty cool idea, though I think it would be a challenge to align the plans perfectly with the actual construction site.
They already exist in much larger packaging.
Nobody uses that stuff, though.
Sure they do. Hololens is used by a large swath of major engineering firms, I've seen people use the Quests fairly extensively for AR, and Apple somehow still sold out their pretty awful AR product as well.
Of course they exist.
So they already "happened".
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Seems you used that word. I'm just responding to your comments.
I think most people understand the difference between "existing" and "happening".
That was the whole point of the original comment.