478
Harm Reduction Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 6 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/196

There are no ethical choices under first-past-the-post voting. We must instead make a decision that reduces the most harm.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

Prove it's not. You're the one claiming that the distinction makes it not analogous. I don't know why you think that would change it so it's impossible for me to address your reasons.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Prove it’s not. You’re the one claiming that the distinction makes it not analogous.

That's not at all how the burden of proof works.

I don’t know why you think that would change it so it’s impossible for me to address your reasons.

You're leaping to the assumption that the scenario you provided is even analogous to the one you replied to. It isn't. You need to start by proving that it is.

this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
478 points (100.0% liked)

196

16543 readers
2643 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS