859
rule (lemmy.zip)
submitted 9 months ago by nebula42@lemmy.zip to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] prunerye@slrpnk.net 10 points 9 months ago

I'm not entirely sure what you're saying either, but nature vs nurture wasn't settled in nurture's favor. It's somewhere in between.

[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

I'll be honest, this doesn't really make sense as a response to my post. It wouldn't really matter where you or I fall on the nature vs nurture argument for my post to be relevant. (Unless one of us somehow believed it was entirely nature.)

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I think there was an implicit premise (intentional or not) in your statement about there being no natural way to let kids develop, and that's what they were commenting on.

[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Oh I see, I used the word natural and they made the connection to the the idea of nature vs nurture because it also uses nature. That makes sense.

this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
859 points (100.0% liked)

196

16851 readers
1743 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS