299
submitted 9 months ago by shish_mish@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 59 points 9 months ago

Good, now start with the sanctions.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sanctions disproportionately hurt innocent civilians. Sanctioning individuals is one thing but entire nations shouldn’t be sanctioned. I thought we learned our lesson from Cuba but apparently not

Edit: for all the neolibs and righties downvoting me, this probably won’t do much to convince you. For anyone else, here’s an explanation on why sanctions are a terrible idea:

https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/sanctions-economy-foreign-policy/tnamp/

Here’s an in depth look at why sanctions fail:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539368

Basically, the entire point of sanctions if to hurt civilians. The logic is supposed to be that they will rise up and force a political change due to being angry and, often, starving to death. But that rarely happens. We just end up torturing poor people while wealthy elites get by just fine.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

You know what hurts innocent civilians even more? Bombing them.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Y’know what avoids both options? Diplomacy.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago
[-] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It was never given a chance

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Ok, time for war? Sure thing, Macnamara

[-] dlatch@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

The discussion was literally about sanctions. Seems like a reasonable step compared to the "war" you immediately jump to, no?

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The comment stated it is too late for diplomacy. That means inflicting suffering via outright war or passive actions like sanctions. Both are attacks on innocent civilians.

[-] dlatch@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Ah yes, because telling Netanyahu "please don't bomb children, that is not really nice" has worked out splendidly so far. Diplomacy without being able to put pressure on is nothing more than kindly asking.

Y'know what is the primary method to apply pressure in diplomacy? Sanctions.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Except they don’t work. Rarely have. All they do is torture innocent civilians and even then, really just the poor ones.

https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/sanctions-economy-foreign-policy/tnamp/

A quick and easy summary

[-] woop_woop@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

Isn't that part of the point? If the populace suffers, government changes are more likely

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

It’s still inhumane. It’s fine to starve people out via sanctions but not via bombings? There’s a reason people like Sanders continue to oppose sanctions

[-] EchoCT@lemmy.ml 20 points 9 months ago

That's the inhumane condition you care about? Not the 34000 dead? Murdering journalists, doctors, food workers? None of that?

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Sanctions don’t stop that. So you have a genocide and a starving populace in a second country. JFC when did Lemmy turn into a bunch of neolibs?

[-] beardown@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Neoliberals love sanctions. Leftists typically oppose suffering.

[-] beardown@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Israel is a democracy, or so we have been told.

Which means sanctions would motivate the voters to elect a new government that opposes genocide. Which is the result we want.

Therefore, sanctions are justified because they would stop Israel's genocide of Gaza by forcing Israeli voters to face the consequence of voting for genocidal fascists

[-] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Why is everyone speaking in hypotheticals/theory? Sanctions have been used in the past. Has it achieved the desired result? If we don't know, maybe start with that

[-] woop_woop@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Which would be better to you? You're a civilian somewhere - do you prefer to watch your livelyhood slowly being destroyed by your government or do you want a boom?

I'd assume the former gives you a chance to recognize it and do something, the latter is just boom.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

False dichotomy. Sanctions don’t stop genocidal maniacs. They just ADD suffering to the world. Would I rather have 1 million people suffer or 2 million? I know the answer!

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

When has that actually worked?

[-] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

You're suggesting that the end of Apartheid was caused solely by the US sanctions causing a popular revolt in South africa?

[-] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I did not mention it was solely due to sanctions. But I do think it played a role.

[-] woop_woop@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Arguably any revolution comes from a critical mass of the population being unhappy..

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

History shows it's never quite that clear cut. However that's rather irrelevant. I'm asking when have US sanctions sparked a popular revolution that overthrew a government that was sanctioned?

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Sanctions have been used many times since Cuba with varying success.

I’d say this situation calls for them to protect other innocent civilians.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Varying success politically, yes. But it always damages innocent civilians.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Some forms of sanctions but how would something like an arms embargo hurt innocent civilians?

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

An arms embargo restricts weapons sales and the like. Sanctions are designed to harm civilians. Suffering is the point. The (typically incorrect) idea is that suffering people will force political change. But again, that has rarely happened. People just end up suffering.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

An arms embargo are a type of sanction.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago
[-] athos77@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago

Aren't we currently sanctioning Russia, North Korea and Iran?

[-] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Yes, also; Afghanistan, The Balkans, Belarus, Central African Republic, China, Cuba, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Hong Kong, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Syria, Ukraine, Venezuela, Yemen, Zimbabwe and countless individuals

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Great examples of suffering people! Especially North Korea.

Edit: and also cases where the sanctions did literally nothing to change those governments’ actions

this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
299 points (100.0% liked)

World News

40543 readers
3413 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS